Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vojidc$2jj85$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: So, What Games Are You Looking Forward To? (2025 Ed)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:37:50 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vojidc$2jj85$1@dont-email.me>
References: <0as4pj531ru40hdt3mf0igb9aokj2tbfd4@4ax.com>
 <06c893e040b8cccc3c19edee870cc912a78367d7@i2pn2.org>
 <9mu9pjdrddr1t9b9fkbpcbrdrhco8j3lda@4ax.com>
 <rttapjdoi9jopqu4d4sri7q4r6dsmfvq83@4ax.com>
 <d7jcpjdf6dr7r4fk7qe747thdn6m5n6a7f@4ax.com>
 <086dqjd12c0n9c03qls5j459sd9bumv8lr@4ax.com>
 <r6veqjta6k7bdv8ajc2jcbfcsuarovpjif@4ax.com>
 <al7oqj5qu9ko35b858jmck8kherv1hn1u0@4ax.com> <voifju$2ct6j$1@dont-email.me>
 <i21qqj5tii8874k7hgjnoqqgittktkchue@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 02:37:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d871b6568d3dcc0f28fb6a9f313a0122";
	logging-data="2739461"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180KQxIAGCUz19VXVbsqLUm"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Eo7DK2jJaa8igwlkonPCH+e3hB0=
In-Reply-To: <i21qqj5tii8874k7hgjnoqqgittktkchue@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2799

On 2/12/2025 12:31 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 07:43:59 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
> <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> I have no problem calling Star Wars 'Science Fantasy'.  But Star Trek is
>> science fiction.  It isn't _hard_ SF, as it includes social changes but
>> SF has a long tradition of that as well.  (And Doc Smith had no real
>> world science to base any of the psi based aspects of Lensmen upon even
>> at the time he wrote those books.)
> 
> I'd agree with you on classic Star Trek, but modern Star Trek is a
> different beast. It's not anything about modern science or examining
> how it would affect social changes anymore. It's soap opera in space
> set against a background that mirrors current events. It's about the
> drama and thus increasingly falls beneath the 'space opera' umbrella.
> 
> (That said, on -increasingly rare- occassion Star Trek does surprise
> by being a bit deeper than usual... but so too does Star Wars
> sometimes, albeit never in the main-line movies.)
> 
Well, I don't know the current "state" of Star Trek.  The last Trek show 
I watched was season 2 of 'Orville'.  Everything is on streaming now and 
I don't do streaming.

-- 
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky 
dirty old man.