Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:58:02 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me> <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me> <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me> <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me> <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me> <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me> <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:58:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="21a5e9895689abe9b26d6121e6556bb4";
	logging-data="3577897"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+LPvz7qQ2uQMemxhpaHoo"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TIiCNCax3iFeYJLW7qfuIzeYUQE=
Bytes: 2799

On 2025-02-14 00:07:23 +0000, olcott said:

> On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>>> 
>>>>>> Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that article
>>>>>> before or when HHH
>>>>> 
>>>>> That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been talking 
>>>>> about in this forum for several years.
>>>> 
>>>> Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that paper.
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line contains
>>>> a false claim.
>>> 
>>> It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
>>> Earth can possibly show otherwise.
>> 
>> The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
>> In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
>> that is not obvious.
> 
> When you try to show the steps attempting to show that
> it is false I will point out the error.

Step 1: Find people who know C.
Step 2: Show them DD of OP and ask.

> This is the only topic that I will discuss and any
> reply not showing all of the steps of a rebuttal
> will be ignored.

You need not tell what you will discuss. When you discuss anything you
should do it so that the topic is obvious.

> Even the stupidest bot that ever existed (Eliza)
> can be a mere naysayer.

Sure, but can you be anything else?

-- 
Mikko