Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 09:17:26 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <vopiio$3ufag$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
 <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
 <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me> <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me>
 <vondj5$3ffar$1@dont-email.me> <vonhl6$3g196$1@dont-email.me>
 <voojt4$3mdke$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 09:17:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9963881d2ae0fc98a5f0f52fe8576d6f";
	logging-data="4144464"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iQBAXfo+WEb8BqbtoHrY3"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8tjJzaOgpxPne5gmEUABqGpsMHU=
Content-Language: nl, en-GB
In-Reply-To: <voojt4$3mdke$5@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3761

Op 15.feb.2025 om 00:33 schreef olcott:
> On 2/14/2025 7:49 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 14.feb.2025 om 13:40 schreef olcott:
>>> On 2/14/2025 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-14 00:07:23 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that 
>>>>>>>>>> article
>>>>>>>>>> before or when HHH
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been 
>>>>>>>>> talking about in this forum for several years.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about 
>>>>>>>> that paper.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line 
>>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>> a false claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
>>>>>>> Earth can possibly show otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
>>>>>> In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
>>>>>> that is not obvious.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you try to show the steps attempting to show that
>>>>> it is false I will point out the error.
>>>>
>>>> Step 1: Find people who know C.
>>>> Step 2: Show them DD of OP and ask.
>>>>
>>>>> This is the only topic that I will discuss and any
>>>
>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>
>>> int DD()
>>> {
>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> int main()
>>> {
>>>    HHH(DD);
>>> }
>>>
>>> DD  correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally.
>>
>> Indeed. The simulation by HHH fails to reach the end of the halting DD.
> 
> different instance with provably different execution trace

Counter factual.
Olcott fails to see that it the same finite string, so the same 
instance. Olcott cannot show the instruction that behaves differently.