Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 11:26:40 -0500
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <voqf86$3q2a$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me>   <vo5cvb$3hukd$1@dont-email.me> <be2d9f3e-be38-451a-8598-de19a949cf1e@att.net> <vo7c1q$7ne$3@dont-email.me> <0d24c3fd-cd63-4e21-9dd4-ab1360560b09@att.net> <cc879e12-d325-48b6-be78-87b8b36cb50d@att.net> <vo8jr7$7mh2$2@dont-email.me> <79920977-902d-4f59-a11c-497383221c82@att.net> <voa1r5$ib75$1@dont-email.me> <468b9c37-ba93-485c-8685-4b320e168251@att.net> <vocig1$15cth$1@dont-email.me> <68bab5c2-50d3-43fc-be0d-51e01c5952bb@att.net> <vof5e4$1n7gr$1@dont-email.me> <a52c053a-8537-4f77-849d-aba3cf51283f@att.net> <vog83h$1rvmp$4@dont-email.me> <aa0dc4b50695d3571aae1a3309c5c87736f82a48@i2pn2.org> <vohskb$28sjf$3@dont-email.me> <862117d5-9944-4eaa-9bbf-040e376c27e1@att.net> <voneac$3eut3$1@dont-email.me> <61fda474-8104-4e37-a1cc-d9fec975bdc5@att.net> <vonrm3$3hu2c$1@dont-email.me> <aced9a6c-e670-40c0-ae9b-53636b4bf97d@att.net> <voq2hj$s46$3@dont-email.me> <voq3u6$1p89$1@dont-email.me> <voq9mm$28vf$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 17:26:48 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a71cf7c61c7349802c2fc05d0bb20298";
	logging-data="125002"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ynKhS8fTD7zH6ZevjsOfjCLCuwZ75yFU="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KP0UF4adBUsz3eAGlHlAwRXvSOw=
X-ICQ: 1701145376
X-Newsreader: MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb

WM was thinking very hard :
> On 15.02.2025 14:13, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> WM was thinking very hard :
> Each FISON and all its predecessors are proven omissible by
>>> induction. This implies that the whole set is omissible.
>> 
>> Only if there were such a thing as a last FISON being omitted.
>
> You are clearly wrong!

Says the person who also says that there are infinite FISONs.