Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:40:20 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 91
Message-ID: <vosbq4$h568$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vnumf8$24cq0$1@dont-email.me> <voamvc$nv62$1@dont-email.me>
 <voatki$p4au$2@dont-email.me> <voau7d$p4sc$2@dont-email.me>
 <voavuf$p4au$4@dont-email.me> <vob15v$ptj9$1@dont-email.me>
 <e3693316b91f4bd357aa26a12ebd469086c11c65@i2pn2.org>
 <vocpt8$16c4e$5@dont-email.me>
 <7ad847dee2cf3bc54cddc66a1e521f8a7242c01f@i2pn2.org>
 <vod3ft$18eoa$1@dont-email.me>
 <50488790b3d697cccde5689919b1d1d001b01965@i2pn2.org>
 <vodrkt$1d1gu$1@dont-email.me>
 <cdaa950d75c0b258288974055228e93f38067535@i2pn2.org>
 <voft9v$1rkco$1@dont-email.me>
 <e351c3a68fe9fffc21c6b82a50743305af794dd0@i2pn2.org>
 <vojrqp$2oikq$3@dont-email.me>
 <ffb46665a51356faf0fa3b56db966a31812e8134@i2pn2.org>
 <vokon8$2t882$1@dont-email.me> <vol0mf$2ulu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vom1q4$34osr$3@dont-email.me>
 <bddf68f22f586b71856518082c6268a78db30d34@i2pn2.org>
 <vondnm$3ffar$2@dont-email.me>
 <666599f1e2ffe5a6cb9a405efa06ae1a51fbe6ca@i2pn2.org>
 <voojmi$3mdke$3@dont-email.me> <vopi6p$3ufag$3@dont-email.me>
 <vorm20$ea63$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:40:21 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed88295eddf76fadd43b844d44533dce";
	logging-data="562376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tmG0bPl93InNEtdeSJyEU"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6CEvnBXfwlxqjZzZACsk3DN4GW8=
In-Reply-To: <vorm20$ea63$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: nl, en-GB
Bytes: 6533

Op 16.feb.2025 om 04:29 schreef olcott:
> On 2/15/2025 2:11 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 15.feb.2025 om 00:30 schreef olcott:
>>> On 2/14/2025 6:58 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Fri, 14 Feb 2025 06:42:29 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 2/14/2025 3:36 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>> Am Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:12:52 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>> On 2/13/2025 8:47 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 13.feb.2025 om 13:31 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2025 3:16 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Am Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:18:32 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2025 2:05 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:19:11 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2025 9:23 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:38:37 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2025 2:48 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:46:21 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2025 6:52 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:02:48 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2025 5:16 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Sun, 09 Feb 2025 13:54:39 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 1:33 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 20:04 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 12:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 18:00 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 10:50 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 16:18 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2025 2:13 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 09.feb.2025 om 07:10 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2025 3:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 08.feb.2025 om 15:47 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2025 3:57 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 08.feb.2025 om 06:53 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2025 7:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/25 8:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2025 5:56 PM, Richard Damon 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/25 11:26 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2025 6:20 AM, Richard Damon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/25 10:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since there is a 5% chance that the treatment I will have next
>>>>>>>>>>> month will kill me and this treatment is my only good chance I
>>>>>>>>>>> will totally ignore anything that diverges from the point.
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I will wait a month then.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyone that knows the C language sufficiently well knows that DD
>>>>>>>>> correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed, which shows the limitation of HHH which makes that it 
>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>> properly decide about its input, because  it must abort the correct
>>>>>>>> simulation before it sees that the correct simulation terminates
>>>>>>>> normally.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The correct simulation is only the one that it sees by 
>>>>>>> definition. it
>>>>>>> maps ITS INPUT TO THE BEHAVIOR OF THIS INPUT.
>>>>>>> All of the people that think it should map the behavior of a non- 
>>>>>>> input
>>>>>>> have always been wrong.
>>>>>> What is the non-input?
>>>>>
>>>>> int main()
>>>>> {
>>>>>     DD();    // Is not an input to HHH
>>>>>     HHH(DD)  // Is an input to HHH
>>>>> {
>>>> Oh, but we’re not interested in the behaviour of HHH(HHH(DD)).
>>>>
>>>>>> The input is DD, and its behaviour is that it halts.
>>>>>> HHH’s simulation is not correct by definition.
>>>
>>> DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally.
>>>
>>
>> Proving the failure to decide by simulation.
>>
>>
> 
> That would be isomorphic to saying that cows prove that
> mammals do not exist.
> 

Claiming that it is isomorphic is counter factual.
It has been shown before that olcott does not understand what isomorphic is.
It has been proven that olcott's HHH claims non-halting for a finite 
string that describes a halting program and therefore fails.
He seems to be desperate and starts to use words he does not understand 
to try to rescue his claim.