Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<votn1l$pb7c$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:58:14 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 58 Message-ID: <votn1l$pb7c$1@dont-email.me> References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me> <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me> <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me> <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me> <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me> <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me> <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me> <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me> <vondj5$3ffar$1@dont-email.me> <vopke4$3v10c$1@dont-email.me> <vosn00$jd5m$1@dont-email.me> <f9a0a18d52ac35171173e0c60c9062e03343ad68@i2pn2.org> <vote0u$nf28$1@dont-email.me> <3b8a5f4be53047b2a6c03f9678d0253e137d3c40@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 22:58:14 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c928bd9eb52e5cb5acf316a3ad4e5e6d"; logging-data="830700"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18l6PICXOQ9omQrX1dVUz0L" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:9jgssPHM/Ss+CdQSZkTUDSJSsqI= Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus-Status: Clean In-Reply-To: <3b8a5f4be53047b2a6c03f9678d0253e137d3c40@i2pn2.org> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250216-4, 2/16/2025), Outbound message Bytes: 4241 On 2/16/2025 2:02 PM, joes wrote: > Am Sun, 16 Feb 2025 13:24:14 -0600 schrieb olcott: >> On 2/16/2025 10:35 AM, joes wrote: >>> Am Sun, 16 Feb 2025 06:51:12 -0600 schrieb olcott: >>>> On 2/15/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2025-02-14 12:40:04 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>> On 2/14/2025 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-02-14 00:07:23 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>> On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said: > >>>>>>>> This is the only topic that I will discuss and any >>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)(); >>>>>> int HHH(ptr P); >>>>>> int DD() >>>>>> { >>>>>> int Halt_Status = HHH(DD); >>>>>> if (Halt_Status) >>>>>> HERE: goto HERE; >>>>>> return Halt_Status; >>>>>> } >>>>>> int main() >>>>>> { >>>>>> HHH(DD); >>>>>> } >>>>>> DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally. >>>>> >>>>> That claim has already shown to be false. Nothing above shows that >>>>> HHH does not return 0. If it does DD also returns 0. >>>> When we are referring to the above DD simulated by HHH and not trying >>>> to get away with changing the subject to some other DD somewhere else >>> such as one that calls a non-aborting version of HHH >>> >>>> then anyone with sufficient knowledge of C programming knows that no >>>> instance of DD shown above simulated by any corresponding instance of >>>> HHH can possibly terminate normally. >>> Well, then that corresponding (by what?) HHH isn’t a decider. >> I am focusing on the isomorphic notion of a termination analyzer. > > (There are other deciders that are not termination analysers.) > >> A simulating termination analyzer correctly rejects any input that must >> be aborted to prevent its own non-termination. > Yes, in particular itself is not such an input, because we *know* that > it halts, because it is a decider. You can’t have your cake and eat it > too. > I am not even using the confusing term "halts". Instead I am using in its place "terminates normally". DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer