Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vou9ts$s9r4$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: tubes vs tubeless? you decide.
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 22:20:25 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vou9ts$s9r4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vosgav$htvh$1@dont-email.me> <vot1n0$l8l7$6@dont-email.me>
 <vot8in$mj7u$1@dont-email.me> <vothgr$ns08$8@dont-email.me>
 <votjt5$op8j$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:20:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0635e581e5b36a461334fd0f38750c59";
	logging-data="927588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cwDslZzjdTsivv2+dYttZHl/hnKO+LdA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6ThGLLDaKOLj+AdMyQDX2f0jRxI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <votjt5$op8j$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2130

On 2/16/2025 4:04 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 2/16/2025 2:23 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>  It seems that fashion often transforms "better under this very 
>> limited circumstance" to "You gotta have this!!!"
>>
>> Really, most "modern" examples of bicycling fashion are chasing 
>> diminishing performance benefits. Any decent quality bicycle is an 
>> amazingly efficient machine. Aero cables, fancy bottom brackets, 
>> tubeless tires give practically unmeasurable performance benefits.
>>
>> And I suspect a fair number of tubeless setups are bought by people 
>> who never learned to fix a flat.
>>
>> But I'm an admitted retrogrouch.
>>
> 
> For road bikes that probably explains a lot of adopters, but there are 
> purposes for which tubeless (even in this current primitive state) 
> solves real problems.

Right. Those purposes constitute what I noted as "better under this very 
limited circumstance" above.



-- 
- Frank Krygowski