Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vourme$12i4q$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:23:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <vourme$12i4q$1@dont-email.me> References: <q9h3rj1j2uj8t08okekkqpuu3eul30f4pa@4ax.com> <H5msP.1310$e6J1.263@fx47.iad> <_VidnePYj72dpy_6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@supernews.com> <FHssP.422382$z8ke.109144@fx15.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:23:42 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7382aa1018309a51972179782263cf1"; logging-data="1132698"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mxWEL+EIRaU2//dvhrAcSuxynSybDB3A=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:d4CmEjj0pKADBv1yvrKzvudyB3c= sha1:bFH1wTMdJXegBcIRMY8FXch1c0k= Bytes: 2395 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-02-16 2:18 p.m., Johnny LaRue wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2025 at 8:53:44 AM EST, "CrudeSausage" <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> >>> On 2025-02-16 6:04 a.m., Joel wrote: >>>> https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/ >>>> >>>> >>>> So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in, >>>> from 2021. OK. Great. Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks. >>> >>> That is honestly very interesting. It's looking like Microsoft is >>> borrowing Apple's approach to support. >> >> Good. It's about damn time. Very hard to move forward when you are still >> supporting ancient hardware (and software). >> >> And let's face it. To have any future at all, Windows desperately needs to >> move forward. > > Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of > functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you > wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way > with Windows again? Because judging the tech market by 30 year old standards is daft. Windows 11 has nothing in common with Windows 3.0.