Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vp06hq$1a7mk$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Even I Will Admit Trump and DOGE May Have Overstepped Here Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 20:35:07 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 95 Message-ID: <vp06hq$1a7mk$1@dont-email.me> References: <voqf0r$3d6j$3@dont-email.me> <voudaf$1088l$2@dont-email.me> <vougp8$10u3m$1@dont-email.me> <vp05bm$19sv7$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:35:07 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18ce198772ed487c9b9ee38c60ed3c54"; logging-data="1384148"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19r35Oe0t/6q+6yFf4t6eiA" User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Cancel-Lock: sha1:CivjGnVKRP3kOgG4WNjoqs7akRM= On Feb 17, 2025 at 12:14:45 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > On 2/17/2025 12:17 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2025 at 8:18:23 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2/16/2025 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> On Feb 16, 2025 at 2:26:53 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2/16/2025 4:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> On Feb 16, 2025 at 12:08:53 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/16/2025 1:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 2025 at 10:29:53 AM PST, "suzeeq" >>>>>>>> <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2/16/2025 10:18 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Found another one. How can Trump be doing this? Doesn't he >>>>>>>>>> know the harm >>>>>>>>>> he's doing to the nation? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> @philllyfanatic: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "I was fired from my job at USAID today. I worked in the Tootsie Pop >>>>>>>>>> department. After 20 years of research and $28.3 million later, we were >>>>>>>>>> *this* close to finding out exactly how many licks it takes to get to the >>>>>>>>>> Tootsie Roll center of a Tootsie Pop. Now we will probably never know." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think the guy is having you on. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What? You mean the Tootsie Pop Department isn't a real thing?!? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My world view is shattered! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A world view based on pseudo-examples was never whole. >>>>>> >>>>>> It was a joke. Sheesh. The stereotypes about leftists being dour, >>>>>> humor-impaired killjoys are alive and well. >>>>> >>>>> It's a joke that purports to characterize and justify destruction of >>>>> USAID. An actual example should be even funnier. >>>> >>>> You're becoming FPP, who always claimed that if he didn't find a joke >>>> funny, >>>> that made him unable to discern it as a joke at all. >>>> >>>> Most normal people can detect jokes even if they don't personally find >>>> them >>>> funny. >>> >>> *This* joke suggests that USAID comprises ridiculous boondoggles. >> >> (1) It apparently does. > > So this "joke" claims, which is funny only if you "know" it's true. > >> (2) Since when do jokes have to be strictly factual? > > One that's not is propaganda. LOL! Wherein moviePig wins the Sandra Fluke Humor Police Award: https://ibb.co/j9r6J4fH >>> It's "evidence" to an audience who has no idea what USAID actually >>> comprises. >> >> Oh, I see. You're just doing a public service, fact-checking jokes for the >> smooth brains in the RAT audience who otherwise would be taken in by my >> humorous "misinformation". I'm sure they're pleased to know to what esteem >> you >> hold their intelligence. >> >> Much like the jokes from the Babylon Bee consistently get "fact-checked" by >> the mainstream media, who strangely don't feel the need to fact-check >> similarly satirical and exaggerated articles by the left-leaning Onion. > > Is there a wide view that USAID promotes only bogus projects? Not only but enough to be a serious problem that needs to be addressed. > I'm aware of only the DEI Irish musical you've singled out as patently > risible, > and it doesn't fit the profile your joke targets. Well, you could just review the earlier posts in this thread for more examples than the Irish musical. I just learned of another one: Millions spent to produce an Afghan version of SESAME STREET.