Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:47:18 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vp0ap5$1asp1$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vo75q5$3vki0$1@dont-email.me> <zCJpP.39$EyH6.1@fx45.iad>
	<vo7ttl$3nof$1@dont-email.me> <qhLpP.67094$za5e.59176@fx09.iad>
	<vo830p$4ntj$1@dont-email.me> <f_1qP.80552$YsRf.33634@fx18.iad>
	<vocbbn$1444h$1@dont-email.me> <1WoqP.4088$NgFa.1524@fx46.iad>
	<voeqct$1lgc9$1@dont-email.me> <6CIqP.4095$NgFa.688@fx46.iad>
	<vogq82$20qbu$1@dont-email.me> <67b07a28$0$29716$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
	<vor0pa$6uru$1@dont-email.me> <m1cq7sFqf8iU1@mid.individual.net>
	<vorhd2$9ned$2@dont-email.me> <0bi2rjtfpg16d2fmbfbjkn4hn2nmqoobji@4ax.com>
	<m1d699Fqf8iU5@mid.individual.net> <UUlsP.61663$JM7f.56314@fx48.iad>
	<vouhgj$10vfr$2@dont-email.me> <LJFsP.349052$ahU8.127965@fx11.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:47:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9855949604aedcf51b441e9be698a62b";
	logging-data="1405729"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yyF+ewk+RblhrsUuDdX8G"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1NF1s3ZVmH8HgEq0yYzsG/PeU48=
Bytes: 2324

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 07:13:31 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

> On 2025-02-17 12:29 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 08:40:02 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> 
>>> The people behind it can't even be bothered to fix the interface and
>>> take it out of mid-1990s.
>> 
>> Form wins over function, eh? Never mind what the software *does*, what
>> matters is how it *looks*.
> 
> It *does* a poor job of filtering posts.

Why did you not mention that up front? why was it the first thing that 
came to your mind was something as trivial as its conformance (or not) to 
prevailing UI fashions?

Like I said, it seems that the actual functionality of the software 
manages at best a poor second to how it looks.