Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vp1243$fou$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.omega.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: snmp unknown object identifier Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:25:39 -0600 Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: <vp1243$fou$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> References: <gTZyspIo72snFwDr@ku.gro.lloiff> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 04:25:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="omega.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.1.11"; logging-data="16158"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <gTZyspIo72snFwDr@ku.gro.lloiff> Bytes: 2185 Lines: 38 On 2/17/25 11:16, Adrian wrote: > Changing ifInOctets to something else (e.g. Time ticks) gives me the > same result, but using the long number (1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0) works. According to the OID repository, 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 is sysUpTimeInstance and doesn't seem to have anything to do with -- what I assume to be -- interface inbound octets. Link - OID repository - 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 = {iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) mgmt(2) mib-2(1) system(1) sysUpTime(3) sysUpTimeInstance(0)} - https://oid-base.com/get/1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0 It seems as if ifInOctets is 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10 Link - OID repository - 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10 = {iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) mgmt(2) mib-2(1) interfaces(2) ifTable(2) ifEntry(1) ifInOctets(10)} - https://oid-base.com/get/1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10 > As I'm not sure what ifInOctets translates to, I can't readily use > the number instead. Are you looking for the system's up time or the number of octets received on interfaces? > Having spent half the afternoon rummaging around on the 'net with no > clear (to me) answer, I'm here. ;-) > Suggestions on where to continue welcomed. :-) -- Grant. . . .