Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:04:02 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vp1ie2$1kmm2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <03gqqj562r4vi0kpi2vl8flsi59jsbot56@4ax.com> <m1is6aFojfiU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:04:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="70d83a8b7940d424b6ea109a568d26b2";
	logging-data="1727170"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dlmoHRhdOloPjUV0wh3EFto+fH4wDv0500nJtHQeemQ=="
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bM3bMUNXpU21pwACVjgO1VsqpBQ=
Bytes: 1357

occam wrote:

> When I eventually tracked it down, I could not figure out which
> passage(s) were the offending ones that got up the beard of Ayatollah
> Khomeini. Ironic, given that the fatwah was issued by a follower of an
> illiterate Prophet.

Maybe they just reacted to the title?

-- 
Bertel
Kolt, Denmark