| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vp2afr$gdf$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Most disappointing films. Date: 18 Feb 2025 15:54:35 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 13 Message-ID: <vp2afr$gdf$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <vovrtm$18b9h$1@dont-email.me> <8p19rjd17h014d0je9c1tt6eskfnpugbla@4ax.com> Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="12426"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Bytes: 1262 Bice <eichler2@comcast.net> wrote: >A while back someone on the current films newsgroup was really talking >up the movie "Sunshine", saying what a great science fiction movie it >was. So I found it on DVD and watched it. Started off with a stupid >premise (a mission to re-ignite the sun with a nuclear bomb) and went >downhill from there. Turned into a really bad slasher flick in the >end. Terrible movie. Perhaps they were confusing it with "Little Miss Sunshine" which is a very fine film albeit with little SF content. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."