Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vp2afr$gdf$1@panix2.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Most disappointing films.
Date: 18 Feb 2025 15:54:35 -0000
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <vp2afr$gdf$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <vovrtm$18b9h$1@dont-email.me> <8p19rjd17h014d0je9c1tt6eskfnpugbla@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
	logging-data="12426"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Bytes: 1262

Bice  <eichler2@comcast.net> wrote:
>A while back someone on the current films newsgroup was really talking
>up the movie "Sunshine", saying what a great science fiction movie it
>was. So I found it on DVD and watched it. Started off with a stupid
>premise (a mission to re-ignite the sun with a nuclear bomb) and went
>downhill from there. Turned into a really bad slasher flick in the
>end. Terrible movie.

Perhaps they were confusing it with "Little Miss Sunshine" which is a very
fine film albeit with little SF content.
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."