Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Most disappointing films.
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:12:05 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vp2bgl$1p40u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vovrtm$18b9h$1@dont-email.me>
 <8p19rjd17h014d0je9c1tt6eskfnpugbla@4ax.com> <vp2afr$gdf$1@panix2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:12:06 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b372b2a851cfd44c2051c732274b27c";
	logging-data="1871902"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/LlbvunyJ1ZnA3oW7iJGsyvTrnyg0MF30="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b4hLq6qYCM5VgHPLEQUvcZZ6IDE=
In-Reply-To: <vp2afr$gdf$1@panix2.panix.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1810

On 2/18/25 10:54 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> Bice  <eichler2@comcast.net> wrote:
>> A while back someone on the current films newsgroup was really talking
>> up the movie "Sunshine", saying what a great science fiction movie it
>> was. So I found it on DVD and watched it. Started off with a stupid
>> premise (a mission to re-ignite the sun with a nuclear bomb) and went
>> downhill from there. Turned into a really bad slasher flick in the
>> end. Terrible movie.
> 
> Perhaps they were confusing it with "Little Miss Sunshine" which is a very
> fine film albeit with little SF content.
> --scott

Or "Sunshine", the excellent book by Robin McKinley.
- Tony