Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: To sum up
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:52:12 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 68
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vp32v1$1tm1k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vo1kt4$2r8m5$1@dont-email.me> <vo1n39$2rdv4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo47ib$3cm8h$1@dont-email.me> <vo7jg5$2090$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7kt0$qvu$2@dont-email.me> <voovjr$3o3ri$1@dont-email.me>
 <vop70b$3sjqq$2@dont-email.me> <ndr0rj1m7bp2r4erpms6mcpquunmu4k9d0@4ax.com>
 <vov55a$13r1b$1@dont-email.me> <k8j8rj5t9n9b91c9q4qo25tiij5jbg7ti0@4ax.com>
 <vp1kc3$1kvce$1@dont-email.me> <upl8rjpg2luq1h0ch9bhv7sqelepba4t2e@4ax.com>
 <vp1o58$1lhpq$1@dont-email.me> <qve9rj1gvh74meg21g8m9471oufhdea239@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="78957"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Say96LyN2+VVrY8fhw09L9bU+to=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id DC82522978C; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:52:29 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77448229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:52:27 -0500 (EST)
	by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 51IMqKM5693983
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:52:20 +0100
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E4E60617
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/B8E4E60617; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
	id 853F8DC01CA; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:52:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:52:18 +0100 (CET)
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <qve9rj1gvh74meg21g8m9471oufhdea239@4ax.com>
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+Ew2EYkln57e6eOm6wKJkUhzKly+7xeqQ=
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5782

On 19/02/2025 3:59 am, Martin Harran wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:41:42 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 18/02/2025 8:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:37:06 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 18/02/2025 8:15 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
>>>>> The question I would like to see you address is how your Intelligent
>>>>> Designer might have gone about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> The human brain indeed has unique characteristics in terms of its
>>>>> ability and functions. Other species do not have those
>>>>> characteristics, but they do have similar brain structures and, as
>>>>> Ernest has pointed out in several examples, those brains can sometimes
>>>>> be argued to be even more complex than the human one. So how do you
>>>>> think your Intelligent Designer went about this? Did he play around
>>>>> with various prototype brain designs on other species and then come up
>>>>> with a particular design that he decided to give to humans alone?
>>>>
>>>> Why the hostile, mocking tone,
>>>
>>> Not meant to be either hostile or mocking but I accept it may come
>>> across that way due to my frustration with you continually refusing to
>>> deal with issues raided by a fellow religious believer. [1]
>>>
>>>> and straw man depiction of God?
>>>
>>> It is you and your fellow IDers who have created a strawman by
>>> pretending to talk about some anodyne designer when you really mean
>>> God; and not just *any* God, the specific Christian God.
>>
>> I'm with many ID proponents who are openly Christians, but in the
>> context of debating the interpretation and implications of scientific
>> evidence, deliberately and correctly refer only to a non-specific
>> intelligent designer interacting with this material world from outside
>> of spacetime.
> 
> Why do you feel the need to hide your religious beliefs; why not just
> come out and talk openly about God? That seems to me a lack of
> confidence in your religious beliefs or at least your ability to
> convince other people.

But I have and do. I've quoted the Bible, I've given a (speculative) 
outline of how God might have created, etc. Happy to be transparent 
about my personal belief.

But when talking about science identifying potential inadequacy of a 
naturalistic explanation, it is appropriate to posit a non-specific 
agency in that context.

I can see how this might construed as deceptive, but it's actually about 
  disciplined argument and avoiding category errors.


> 
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ===========================
>>>
>>> [1] For example, still waiting for you to produce the evidence you
>>> promised 10 days ago about ID gaining traction.
>>>
>>
>> It'll come, I'm still doing midnighters. And distracting myself with
>> posts like these.
>