Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vp51ek$2bemd$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: efji <efji@efi.efji>
Newsgroups: fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: Nouvelle courbe
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:38:44 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <vp51ek$2bemd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <XGOaF44D85cNlB_rsmxP9NYujQA@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:38:45 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9a08d2d793cdc368eb254a957da207b8";
	logging-data="2472653"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cP2WwttOCs+zW2DVUoom0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IOax0FNMu96FauD9rYZmITFxHUI=
In-Reply-To: <XGOaF44D85cNlB_rsmxP9NYujQA@jntp>
Content-Language: fr, en-US
Bytes: 1236

Le 19/02/2025 à 16:20, Richard Hachel a écrit :

f(x)=x^3+3x-4
> et donc aucune inflexion de la courbe

Mais quel crétin quand même...
Un conseil : ne pas employer de terme mathématique quand on en ignore la 
signification précise.

-- 
F.J.