Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: [NEWS] iPhone 16e announced
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:30:49 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vp86u9$30uo2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vp5dcd$2dsm7$1@dont-email.me> <vp5hu3$2enuc$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p29xuxs4i03000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <vp84d0$30i7c$1@dont-email.me> <vp86q8$gln4$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 22:30:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8580c537bbcf9c4d00eeee568ffeb20e";
	logging-data="3177218"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tnWjsJeKOvyUMzC/d4KZP+KD3r6DoNuQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KmRZNrkVW2BvB3Iz+kc5L1Yc9So=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <vp86q8$gln4$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 2338

On 2025-02-20 13:28, badgolferman wrote:
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Chris wrote:
>>>
>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The replacement for the iPhone SE has been announced and will be
>>>>> released next week. The iPhone 16e is also the first device to
>>>>> have  Apple's new C1 in-house modem chip.
>>>>
>>>> There's no need to make such a long copy and paste job when a link
>>>> would have sufficed.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have an opinion about it you want to share?
>>>
>>> I appreciate the full post without comment.
>>
>> Except it wasn't. There was more. A lot more...
>>
>>> It allows me to form my
>>> own opinion without being told what to think.
>>
>> It's called making conversation or having a discussion. Having an opinion
>> is not forcing anyone how to think. It adds perspective and *makes* you
>> think. I do understand that kind of attitude is frowned upon these days.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> He started the conversation by providing a topic. The next person (you)
> should have opined on his topic.
Really?

What PRECISELY was the topic that was provided?