Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: [NEWS] iPhone 16e announced
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:33:02 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <vp872e$glq0$1@solani.org>
References: <vp5dcd$2dsm7$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp5hu3$2enuc$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0p29xuxs4i03000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <vp84d0$30i7c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp86rm$30upt$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 21:33:02 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="546624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s1rO+uqIYFuDaOq69TBwBhQ5VaY= sha1:Pad6XutpwB1t5gzmZWsqCoFZRwU=
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBACAEBMCVvng0jsj+I3RHsWXlajTlcNpPzWlNN6mEYEQt5Hm+wqZdeWhVj4maTEw01uZRXIoTH1q4FTA=
Bytes: 2449
Lines: 39

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2025-02-20 12:47, Chris wrote:
>> badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Chris wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The replacement for the iPhone SE has been announced and will be
>>>>> released next week. The iPhone 16e is also the first device to
>>>>> have  Apple's new C1 in-house modem chip.
>>>> 
>>>> There's no need to make such a long copy and paste job when a link
>>>> would have sufficed.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you have an opinion about it you want to share?
>>> 
>>> I appreciate the full post without comment.
>> 
>> Except it wasn't. There was more. A lot more...
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> It's neither fish nor fowl.
> 
>> 
>>> It allows me to form my
>>> own opinion without being told what to think.
>> 
>> It's called making conversation or having a discussion. Having an opinion
>> is not forcing anyone how to think. It adds perspective and *makes* you
>> think. I do understand that kind of attitude is frowned upon these days.
> Amazing that the very same people who will criticize you for supposedly 
> "tell [them] what to think"...
> 
> ...are themselves usually doing exactly that.
> 

It’s amazing! One guy says there was too much content and now the other
says there wasn’t enough so he posted the whole article.