Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:55:32 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <vpbhrk$3mfi7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
 <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
 <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me>
 <ee9d41d5f1c2a8dd8ff44d3ddeee20d2c3bcccc1@i2pn2.org>
 <vomgd8$3anm4$2@dont-email.me>
 <f5d6cbae83eb89e411d76d1d9ca801ef2678cec2@i2pn2.org>
 <voojl9$3mdke$2@dont-email.me>
 <855e571c6668207809e1eb67138de6af48d164fa@i2pn2.org>
 <vorlqp$aet5$2@dont-email.me>
 <e174ca1c1cbc58c67ffae3b67b69f63f21a82f86@i2pn2.org>
 <vp69r4$2mdtr$1@dont-email.me>
 <8fa176d46bf5b8c36def9e32ced67a1a3f81bae1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 04:55:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="09a546ab9fb90a2d9b3971b67b6837a2";
	logging-data="3882567"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/qtnjIY5c46iNZXQ9ueB4"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:P+4m0eZhxY1iO6EaWcHoP0nn+F8=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <8fa176d46bf5b8c36def9e32ced67a1a3f81bae1@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250221-8, 2/21/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4778

On 2/20/2025 4:00 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:08:05 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> On 2/16/2025 6:55 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:25:12 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 2/15/2025 4:03 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>> Am Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:29:45 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> On 2/14/2025 6:54 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:21:59 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2025 9:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/25 7:07 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article before or when HHH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talking about in this forum for several years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that paper.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains a false claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is a truism and not one person on the face of the Earth can
>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly show otherwise.
>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a
>>>>>>>>>>> truism.
>>>>>>>>>>> In order to determine the claim is false one needs some
>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge that is not obvious.
>>>>>>>>>> When you try to show the steps attempting to show that it is
>>>>>>>>>> false I will point out the error.
>>>>>>>>> We havm, but you are too stupid to understand it.
>>>>>>>>> Since when DD run, it halts,
>>>>>>>> THAT IS A DIFFERENT INSTANCE
>>>>>>> Why are you passing the wrong input to HHH?
>>>>>> I will begin ignoring insincere replies.
>>>>> Yes, please shut up.
>>>>> But why are you not passing the same instance to HHH?
>>>> The first instance of recursion is not exactly the same as subsequent
>>>> instances of the exact same sequence of recursive invocations.
>>>> It is the same with recursive simulations. When the second recursive
>>>> invocation has been aborted the first one terminates normally
>>>> misleading people into believing that the recursive chain terminates
>>>> normally.
>>> How interesting. Might this be due to a global variable that basically
>>> toggles termination?
>> Termination analyzers determine whether or not their input could
>> possibly terminate normally. Nothing can toggle this.
> Not even the variable Root in line 502 of Halt7.c?
> 

https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
You are not even in the correct function.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer