Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 07:09:05 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vpcep1$3trlb$2@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$cafc8$bfbb8fc4$c42dd6c$e546c2b2@linux.rocks>
 <vpap4r$3hi9b$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:09:06 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="60621d8483bc1ae326a09603348eeb24";
	logging-data="4124331"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3ODYTYWiKcY6HG3mJ8wPWZqODV+loAGk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dfrNhrUMShWT4FpBKoye5Ur5zPg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vpap4r$3hi9b$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2224

On 2/21/25 15:53, DFS wrote:
> On 2/21/2025 2:50 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
>> The biggest fucking image (almost) that I have ever encountered
>> is located here:
>>
>> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/ 
>> The_Garden_of_Earthly_Delights_by_Bosch_High_Resolution.jpg
>>
>> It measures 30,000 X 17,000 pixels. 
> 
> incorrect.   Your GuhNoo crapware is faulty, as usual.
> 
> 
> I downloaded it with wget.
> size on disk: 233,684,992 bytes.
> width:  30000 pixels
> height: 17078 pixels
> unique colors: 771607  (irfanview)

The "Huge!" part got me looking at a Kodachrome slide scan I'd done:

size: 1,208,386,573 bytes (1.21 GB on disk)
width:  11551
height: 17433
unique colors:  {no idea}

For 'unique colors', I'd not ever thought about that metric; I'll have 
to see if my existing imaging tools support it, or go get irfanview to 
give it a try that way.

FYI, reason for my file's size is that its at 16 bits/channel ... from 
way back when it was scanned in 2004.  Didn't turn out to be necessary, 
IMO, but it shows what COTS imaging capabilities existed 20 years ago.


-hh