Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: To sum up
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:03:25 -0600
Organization: University of Ediacara
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vpfgsc$kc85$1@solani.org>
References: <vo1kt4$2r8m5$1@dont-email.me> <vo1n39$2rdv4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo47ib$3cm8h$1@dont-email.me> <vo7jg5$2090$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7kt0$qvu$2@dont-email.me> <voovjr$3o3ri$1@dont-email.me>
 <vop4bn$3sjqq$1@dont-email.me> <vpeel4$cd88$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpf2f8$g3l3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="58426"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EkHXSOxBrJFxyu1tLuoNedkg0us=
Return-Path: <news@reader5.news.weretis.net>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 649FA22978C; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 11:03:36 -0500 (EST)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC71229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 11:03:34 -0500 (EST)
	id E16E21C4D51; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAFE41C03FB
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pmx.weretis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588E23E8BD
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 17:03:26 +0100 (CET)
	id C0E493E911; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 17:03:25 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <vpf2f8$g3l3$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-CA
X-User-ID: eJwNyUkBwEAIBDBL3GBngY5/CeWbuAbHpIWHORydVQyKjyBDnNS6+gzgq9NLh8hrqa3x/QEbzhFY
Bytes: 3898
Lines: 41

On 2025-02-23 5:57 a.m., Ernest Major wrote:
> On 23/02/2025 06:19, Mark Isaak wrote:
>> On 2/14/25 8:14 PM, MarkE wrote:
>>> On 15/02/2025 1:53 pm, Mark Isaak wrote:
>>>> On 2/8/25 5:06 AM, MarkE wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> My argument is therefore, as complexity goes up, the challenges to 
>>>>> naturalistic OOL and evolution also increase.
>>>>
>>>> Evolution produces complexity without the least concern. Design 
>>>> tries to minimize it and create simplicity. As complexity goes up, 
>>>> the challenge to designed OOL also increases.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "Evolution produces complexity without the least concern."
>>>
>>> You're making an assertion about a fundamental contention, i.e. the 
>>> capability of evolution.
>>>
>>> Do you realise that's what you're doing?
>>>
>>> Do you realise that's neither an argument nor a rebuttal?
>>
>> I am thinking of the products of evolutionary algorithms. They get 
>> quite complex. And no wonder, since there is nothing inherent in the 
>> algorithms to limit complexity. On the other hand, complexity *is* 
>> limited by the algorithms of intelligent design, since the design 
>> needs to be simple enough for designers (and repairers and 
>> maintainers) to understand it.
>>
> 
> An omnipotent omniscient designer isn't limited by an ability to 
> comprehend the complexity. ID people get to resort to "mysterious ways 
> beyond human understanding".
> 
Absolutely. Of course, that 'explanation' has the same explanatory power 
as "beats me".

-- 
--
Don Cates ("he's a cunning rascal" PN)