Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vpful0$ku4p$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Mother arrested because 10 year old son walked alone to store
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:58:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <vpful0$ku4p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vpe92m$c6c5$2@dont-email.me>
 <qsblrjhvg0e5di2d3n3ir2l7soh0vq4jj9@4ax.com> <vpfnsa$jg3o$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:58:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9c6b40138ec13cbd8a79a8278de1eff5";
	logging-data="686233"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eR2TtxN7WfI5qax0wvNi3vEPPZ8t4fM8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hp0NOWZv94YS/SguGZDbe1NFktw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vpfnsa$jg3o$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4613

On 2/23/2025 1:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2025 at 9:18:41 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 04:44:06 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Three months ago, a mother took one child to the doctor. While at the
>>> doctor, her 10 year old son, left home alone, walked a mile to the
>>> store. Now, he didn't have her permission but it wasn't a big deal for
>>> the mother as her son hadn't gone anywhere he wasn't familiar with.
>>>
>>> The cop that showed up at the house arrested her for reckless
>>> endangerment, stating that it was illegal (in Georgia) for a 10 year old
>>> to walk alone.
>>
>> I guess I broke the law as a child more than once.
> 
> All the time. We weren't just walking down to the store, either.
> 
> On a typical Saturday, we would set out on our bikes first thing in the
> morning and be gone all day. (We had to be gone before dad got going or we'd
> end up having to do yard work all day.) Our rule was we had to be home for
> dinner before the streetlights came on, but for the rest of the day, our
> parents had no idea where we were while we were out in the woods miles away
> riding the trails, building forts, playing ball, etc. Today, that would be
> (absurdly) chargeable as criminal child abuse/neglect.
> 
> The frequent response is, "Well, we live in more dangerous times now", but
> that's completely false. Per the FBI crime statistics, it's actually much
> *safer* now in terms of child assault/abduction/murder than it was in the
> "good old days" of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. When I was 10 years old, I had
> some weirdo pull up beside me in a black van while I was out riding my bike
> and ask if I wanted a ride and kept trying to convince me to come with him. I
> told him to get lost and when he kept following me, rode toward the police
> station. Once he realized where I was going, he sped away.
> 
> The difference is that thanks to 24-hour cable news, now you hear about cases
> you never would have heard about back then. During those times, there were
> essentially only three channels on TV-- ABC, CBS, and NBC-- and they had only
> 30 minutes per day to bring you the news from the whole world. So the story
> about a little girl that got abducted in Idaho was pushed aside for a story
> about the latest incursion by the Soviet Union or the political battles in
> Congress. Then came CNN and 24-hour news and rather than have to cut stories,
> they were struggling to fill the schedule all day, every single day, and
> suddenly you started hearing about crimes you never knew had been occurring
> the entire time and the perception was that suddenly there was an explosion of
> child molesters out there, hiding behind every shrub and tree trunk.
> 
>>> Finally, prosecutors decide not to proceed but charges are dropped
>>> WITHOUT prejudice, which allows them to be refiled again within two
>>> years of the incident.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0CKus1J1DU

I don't like that Google now leads with its AI's response. 
Nevertheless, here's what it said:

    "Whether children are safer today is complex and depends on many 
factors, including location, socioeconomic conditions, and individual 
circumstances. However, there are some signs that children are safer 
today than in the past."