| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vphh3k$109m8$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: @ SCOS Message Format ? Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 10:19:32 +0000 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 79 Message-ID: <vphh3k$109m8$2@dont-email.me> References: <a936673b2ed0cc59965b531d3bac44b4$1@octade.net> <vobg9s$smgg$1@dont-email.me> <vobnr5$tmpm$2@dont-email.me> <vobrr2$u49l$2@dont-email.me> <vp8mtf$33amq$1@dont-email.me> <vp8pst$33rjg$1@dont-email.me> <vpauc6$3hnj8$1@dont-email.me> <vpbr94$3rcsk$1@dont-email.me> <vpc1af$3s42d$1@dont-email.me> <vpc3gu$3sf6s$1@dont-email.me> <vpesnp$eqgu$1@dont-email.me> <vpeurd$f198$1@dont-email.me> <vphfe9$10s64$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:19:33 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="660b11caec2332861c3fa1b2145fde54"; logging-data="1058504"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185DSMZIrfyK4JQ/tbVZolfEmwy2ttUbmORUsJhMvIxew==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+EFD/23JghQyf6FDqS5iZMSH4PM= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <vphfe9$10s64$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4343 On 24/02/2025 09:51, David Entwistle wrote: > On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:55:41 +0000, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> I did. I found no articles under your name in the current feed for that >> group. >> >> I have found nothing of the kind in that group. >> > > Oh dear. Stephan found them. Perhaps your reader. ;) My reader is Thunderbird. My server is Eternal September. > they should start at: > > Subject: Character Test > Message-ID: <vpeakb$cgsc$1@dont-email.me> They don't. I see no articles from you in the current feed, which purports to go back to 2017. >> If your newsreader turns valid C into sad faces, your newsreader is >> broken. Solution: download a newsreader that works. > > Okay, but I've now used a couple of popular newsgroup readers, and with > default settings I don't see valid C code in the reader message display of > either. What C code? Perhaps we are talking at cross-purposes. I am not talking about any specific C code in any specific message. I am talking about newsreaders that could corrupt valid C code by turning valid syntax into emoticons. You seem to think that such corruption would be justifiable. I disagree. > My concern is that if we get three new human readers of sci.crypt, keen to > learn, but relatively inexperienced, and as an introduction we post a > SCOS-encrypted ciphertext as a challenge, and then ask each how many > characters are there in the ciphertext, we will likely get three different > answers. I consider that to be unlikely, since the only way it could happen is that two of them have broken newsreaders (and, for there to be /three/ answers, they'd have to be broken in two different ways). >> I will not deny that I find it a little frustrating that you have >> continually ignored my substantive point, which is that you are >> attempting to fix the wrong software. But a reasonable man is open to >> persuasion, and you do strike me as being a reasonable man, so I live in >> hope. > > Sorry for the frustration - I recognize I must be causing it and it pains > me. However, I feel I am speaking on behalf of the other new and less- > experienced readers and potential readers. These new and less experienced readers presumably all use new and less experienced newsreaders. >> The fix is simple. Get a newsreader that doesn't mangle articles, not >> least because much of what is posted here is source code, and an attempt >> to change programming language syntax to indulge Pan's corrupting whim >> is not likely to succeed. > > Pan's and Thunderbird's whim... I'll think about it. I have found no problem with Thunderbird corrupting text. Can you post an example that my reader (115.18.0 (64-bit)) will mangle in the way you claim? -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within