| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vpj99o$1gok4$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- RECURSIVE CHAIN
--- Saving Democracy
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 21:18:32 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <vpj99o$1gok4$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vpdqc8$6bqs$1@dont-email.me>
<vpe1g3$7gnd$1@dont-email.me> <vpflv1$j7qb$1@dont-email.me>
<vpfnhm$jena$1@dont-email.me> <vpgded$nkbd$1@dont-email.me>
<vpgdn8$nlei$1@dont-email.me> <vpgh33$o4p7$1@dont-email.me>
<vpghkq$o82o$1@dont-email.me> <vpgk2q$okhu$1@dont-email.me>
<vpgo94$p8he$1@dont-email.me> <vpgoia$p9vl$1@dont-email.me>
<vpgrdl$tdkf$1@dont-email.me> <vpgtb3$tiun$2@dont-email.me>
<vpgth7$tdkf$3@dont-email.me> <vpgufr$truc$1@dont-email.me>
<vpguru$tdkf$4@dont-email.me> <vpgvcv$tuuf$1@dont-email.me>
<vphr67$13hrc$1@dont-email.me> <vpi0rc$14kaj$1@dont-email.me>
<vpi1ni$13hrc$3@dont-email.me> <vpio66$1euhp$1@dont-email.me>
<vpipdj$1f8pm$1@dont-email.me> <vpiujl$1fvqe$2@dont-email.me>
<vpj1if$1gok4$1@dont-email.me> <vpj5dg$1hb0e$1@dont-email.me>
<vpj683$1gok4$3@dont-email.me> <vpj7ep$1hivf$1@dont-email.me>
<vpj7mh$1gok4$4@dont-email.me> <vpj862$1hivf$2@dont-email.me>
<vpj8fo$1gok4$5@dont-email.me> <vpj94u$1hivf$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:18:32 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9eeafc121d03898926ad9caf9449da30";
logging-data="1598084"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+z756pkon2yhd9aAgDvPdn"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MDe/f8OYdU1uwC6XKAe+IHl4QU8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vpj94u$1hivf$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4313
On 2/24/2025 9:15 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 2/24/2025 8:04 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 2/24/2025 8:59 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2025 7:51 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 2/24/2025 8:47 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 2/24/2025 7:26 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/24/2025 8:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/24/2025 6:06 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/24/2025 6:16 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/24/2025 3:47 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/24/2025 4:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HHH that aborts its simulation and a purely
>>>>>>>>> hypothetical (imaginary never implemented)
>>>>>>>>> HHH that never aborts its simulation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same thing. F aborts its (admittedly poor) simulation by
>>>>>>>> breaking out of a recursive chain, and a hypothetical F that
>>>>>>>> performs a correct unaborted simulation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The simple fact that the hypothetical HHH would never
>>>>>>> terminate conclusively proves that DD specifies behavior
>>>>>>> that cannot possibly terminate normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the simple fact that the hypothetical F would never terminate
>>>>>> conclusively proves that no_numbers_greater_than_10 specifies
>>>>>> behavior that cannot possibly terminate normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed?
>>>>>
>>>>> I will not discuss your code.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll let you respond to yourself here:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2024 11:41 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> > That is a dishonest dodge. An honest rebuttal would explain
>>>> > all of the details of how I am incorrect. You can't do that
>>>> > because I am correct.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your code is not isomorphic to my code thus an
>>> irrelevant change of subject away from the point.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> That is counter-factual.
>>
>> According to you, the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HHH is
>> defined by this code:
>>
>> int HHH(ptr P)
>> {
>> /* replace all code with an unconditional simulator */
>> }
>>
>
> I already corrected you on this misunderstanding.
> HHH has two versions the real one and the imaginary
> on that never aborts the simulation of its input.
>
>
>
And F has two versions, a real one and the imaginary one that never
aborts the simulation of its input.