| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vpjf0i$1nanm$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Cracking Speech by JDV! Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:56:00 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 120 Message-ID: <vpjf0i$1nanm$2@dont-email.me> References: <1r7sjqk.m9ljiy1luon6oN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <voqkbc$4e8g$1@dont-email.me> <1bu1rj9jv89lkmu62k6kc5537ch5j7flht@4ax.com> <it52rjp2tbd8klbs1ql1rrs1iiupa7kmg4@4ax.com> <1r7uesc.u8973e1bpa5z4N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <doa4rj5b2ahdeno6a41p717hqtmut4rpaa@4ax.com> <vou99s$rm6g$7@dont-email.me> <1r7w9dm.1vd6xpc1u7k344N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vov6sd$149qa$1@dont-email.me> <uvl6rjpc1dk9p14oucagn62ttinjaf63ri@4ax.com> <vp0635$1a1t5$1@dont-email.me> <sgjprj9i70rbcicqtg17i3379frmte0jpi@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 04:56:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a87b1e1ca8ade495ffc04dd7242fc2d1"; logging-data="1813238"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lw+Uydk0k8cDcbVUmcQj65fgPe62AA3g=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WTmCkrKOInNZ+dmKLhJgWOkgBBE= In-Reply-To: <sgjprj9i70rbcicqtg17i3379frmte0jpi@4ax.com> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250224-8, 25/2/2025), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 6673 On 25/02/2025 7:03 am, john larkin wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:31:58 +0100, Jeroen Belleman > <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: > >> On 2/17/25 16:45, John Larkin wrote: >>> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:39:19 +0100, Jeroen Belleman >>> <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/17/25 11:09, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>>>> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 17/02/2025 5:17 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:10:26 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >>>>>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 12:31:48 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 10:53:37 -0700, Don Y >>>>>>>>>> <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/15/2025 3:07 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > It was clearly aimed at the >>>>>>>>>>> home market; he was supposed to be there to > talk about security in >>>>>>>>>>> Europe and never even mentioned Ukraine. All >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We (US) are governed by "entertainers", now more than ever. It is the >>>>>>>>>>> nature of our "system" that we reward people who can win races instead >>>>>>>>>>> of govern. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And, all of them end up "old and gray" (or, oldER and BALD as is the >>>>>>>>>>> case of The Orange One) in the process. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> that this speech has done is to turn most European countries against >>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of ignorant, thuggish, self-serving America he represents. >>>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately there are still many Americans who are not like that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is probably a good thing. Unless you are Putin. It's pretty clear >>>>>>>>>>> that Russia is a Potemkin power -- definitely not a "World Power". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The threat he poses is the threat ANY nation possessing nukes poses. >>>>>>>>>>> Care to make any guesses as to how many exist? Or, *could* exist if >>>>>>>>>>> gifted the technology? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The big question about Russian missiles and nukes is, will they work? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Russians know that their stuff isn't especially reliable, then and >>>>>>>>> now. So they have always used lots of warheads, so at least one will >>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Four of them came down in Romania last week - we haven't heard much >>>>>>>> about that on the UK news. Two were in Moldavia, close to the border, >>>>>>>> so they might have been a mistake, but two more were well inside >>>>>>>> Romania. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps if we hadn't breached the Minsk II Treaty and expanded NATO up >>>>>>> to Russia's doorstep, none of this ghastly mess would have happened in >>>>>>> the first place. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a reminder of why Russia's neighbours >>>>>> were so keen to join NATO. >>>>>> >>>>>> The ghastly mess is entirely driven by Russia's territorial ambitions. >>>>> >>>>> ...and the failure of the rest of the World to react to it strongly and >>>>> quickly enough. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Which would have triggered another world war. >>>> >>>> I'm sorry for Ukraine, but they've committed a grave error >>>> trying to snuggle up to NATO too early. It might have worked >>>> if they'd waited another 50 years or so, or until relations >>>> of Russia with the west had developed into solid mutual trust. >>>> Unfortunately, that is now out of the question. >>>> >>>> It's really a pity. For a while, it looked like it could >>>> become a reality. >>>> >>>> Jeroen Belleman >>> >>> "The West" is seductive. People want fresh fruit, uncensored internet, >>> freedom of speech, genuine elections. Getting that isn't snuggling up >>> to NATO as much as it's becoming a modern country. >>> >>> Putin needs a poor, ignorant, obedient, patriotic population, which is >>> why he calls "the West" - actually The Enlightenment - his enemy. >>> >> >> The order is important. Becoming a modern country comes before >> becoming a member of NATO. (I still have doubts about Turkey.) >> >> I'm convinced that Putin also wants a modern, economically >> successful country, but above that, he wants to conserve its >> sovereignty. Getting hemmed in by its traditional long-time >> adversaries makes him understandably nervous. >> >> The US makes *me* nervous. It's far too meddlesome and has a >> track record of foul play. >> >> Jeroen Belleman > > European wars don't make me nervous. They have been so routine for so > many millenia that they are boring. Not for the participants. And war has changed a lot over the millenia. > Too bad about the genocides. Lots of innocents have died. Genocide is a pretty recent phenomena. In most wars you kill your enemies, rather than members of some specific human group. If a civilian population is feeding your enemies you tend to kill them too, but that isn't genocide - just strategy. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney