Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:46:45 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <vpla7l$25vp2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
 <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
 <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me> <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me>
 <vondj5$3ffar$1@dont-email.me> <vopke4$3v10c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vore4m$9ddo$1@dont-email.me> <vpkq6t$22eec$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpl0h8$23vks$4@dont-email.me> <vpl3b4$24nse$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 21:46:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="17e5a05b7136cdaa772e93aa83241211";
	logging-data="2293538"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ZNw4gYSXYcgWp+MQg8tNd"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Oa9vQ03rv/lChwctA58tDv5maVM=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250225-8, 2/25/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vpl3b4$24nse$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3258

On 2/25/2025 12:49 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 2/25/2025 1:01 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 2/25/2025 10:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> Althogh the subject line has the words "COMPLETE PROOF" there is no
>>> proof or pointer to proof below.
>>>
>>
>>
>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>
>> int DD()
>> {
>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>    return Halt_Status;
>> }
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>    HHH(DD);
>> }
>>
>> The above does specify that DD simulated by HHH
>> cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
>> own "return" instruction.
>>
>> That this may be beyond your technical skill level.
>> is less than no rebuttal at all.
>>
>> Ignoring the code in main() seemed dishonest.
>>
> 
> int no_numbers_greater_than_10();
> 
> int F(uintptr_t p);
> 
> int no_numbers_greater_than_10()
> {
>    return F((uintptr_t)no_numbers_greater_than_10);
> }
> 
> int main()
> {
>    F((uintptr_t)no_numbers_greater_than_10);
>    return 0;
> }
> 
> 
> The above does specify that no_numbers_greater_than_10 simulated by F
> cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
> own "return" instruction.
> 
> That this may be beyond your technical skill level
> is less than no rebuttal at all.

Finally you made something that was not wrong in several different ways.
So what is your point?

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer