| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vplhqi$26ur1$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:56:19 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <vplhqi$26ur1$5@dont-email.me> References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net> <vde4b8$268qv$22@dont-email.me> <1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <wrapper-20241001111737@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com> <vpl91g$25q46$1@dont-email.me> <1976765442.762208809.808387.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <20250225130315.00004e34@gmail.com> <lhqvP.1323465$if26.592741@fx13.iad> <1924764604.762215659.468999.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 23:56:19 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d946ba1e23e7536b5a94a8b1caef1d0d"; logging-data="2325345"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Cbh3nYj3dZddIdNXpa8j/" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wDMIxgopp/U9GlR/LqpBH8u0mYg= Bytes: 2185 On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:47:15 -0700, Peter Flass wrote: > The idea of defining different-sized bytes is a real plus. What they meant by “bytes” was really just “bitfields”. With the move to 64-bit addressing, I’ve often felt that it was a missed opportunity to reserve the bottom 3 bits for a bit offset within a byte. That way, you could have arbitrary bitfield addressing available, without any change to the pointer format. Of course it would only be available in a select few instructions (e.g. “load bitfield”, “store bitfield”); other memory-referencing instructions would either ignore those bottom 3 bits or insist they be zero.