Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:40:48 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vplke0$27kuo$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vo7be3$jug$1@dont-email.me>
 <vo7r8d$36ra$3@dont-email.me> <vo9ura$i5ha$1@dont-email.me>
 <voahc5$m3dj$8@dont-email.me> <vocdo9$14kc0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vocpl7$16c4e$4@dont-email.me> <vof56u$1n9k0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vofnj2$1qh2r$2@dont-email.me> <vohrmi$29f46$1@dont-email.me>
 <vojs0e$2oikq$4@dont-email.me> <vokdha$2rcqi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vom1fr$34osr$1@dont-email.me> <von0iq$3d619$1@dont-email.me>
 <vondj5$3ffar$1@dont-email.me> <vopke4$3v10c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vore4m$9ddo$1@dont-email.me> <vpkq6t$22eec$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpl0h8$23vks$4@dont-email.me> <vpl3b4$24nse$2@dont-email.me>
 <vpla7l$25vp2$1@dont-email.me> <vplc1t$26cqb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:40:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ac6d3b444f758916573bdf6c20a8a1c1";
	logging-data="2347992"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tgFSPvHa5++F0PBIzBOOc"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pbu4qDDRgPl+XgS3eNi2Rvqa4dA=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250225-8, 2/25/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vplc1t$26cqb$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3659

On 2/25/2025 3:17 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 2/25/2025 3:46 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 2/25/2025 12:49 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 2/25/2025 1:01 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> Althogh the subject line has the words "COMPLETE PROOF" there is no
>>>>> proof or pointer to proof below.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>>
>>>> int DD()
>>>> {
>>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> int main()
>>>> {
>>>>    HHH(DD);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> The above does specify that DD simulated by HHH
>>>> cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
>>>> own "return" instruction.
>>>>
>>>> That this may be beyond your technical skill level.
>>>> is less than no rebuttal at all.
>>>>
>>>> Ignoring the code in main() seemed dishonest.
>>>>
>>>
>>> int no_numbers_greater_than_10();
>>>
>>> int F(uintptr_t p);
>>>
>>> int no_numbers_greater_than_10()
>>> {
>>>    return F((uintptr_t)no_numbers_greater_than_10);
>>> }
>>>
>>> int main()
>>> {
>>>    F((uintptr_t)no_numbers_greater_than_10);
>>>    return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> The above does specify that no_numbers_greater_than_10 simulated by F
>>> cannot possibly terminate normally by reaching its
>>> own "return" instruction.
>>>
>>> That this may be beyond your technical skill level
>>> is less than no rebuttal at all.
>>
>> Finally you made something that was not wrong in several different ways.
>> So what is your point?
>>
> 
> So you agree that no_numbers_greater_than_10 simulated by F is non-halting?

Yes

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer