Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: efji <efji@efi.efji>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: New equation
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:46:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vppc9h$32bv9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <CJRYb90R4pKx6LHEBcCdcCA4y30@jntp>
 <d2lprjtieerl4rjrqs9s878j0d03jm645q@4ax.com>
 <MimQ6gJUHMh7Qd3O8h9HuwqFhUg@jntp>
 <15vqrj5iscra2hlaiukp60qo0mkiquvai8@4ax.com>
 <esk4yUvD7xtbFRMwGfaB_cgVGwg@jntp> <vpld4o$26f02$1@dont-email.me>
 <ZuBkOZlN3Tt29PxIPLwN6BSCDt0@jntp> <vpli8o$27a25$2@dont-email.me>
 <paGqSVDKFAulO0cdlEqGbkSJSws@jntp> <vplobr$28etg$1@dont-email.me>
 <_Obp8c7UY5bGF28tIGHuSkSSSTo@jntp> <vplu46$294n9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpm321$29pat$1@dont-email.me>
 <p6OcnTFAkOVreiL6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:46:25 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2448606a97e2833e484f510ea618ec0";
	logging-data="3223529"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uBnACEgB85vFmiE3w2X0+"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B4spLONGO5bhpKK4zpf9QvGjM7k=
Content-Language: fr, en-US
In-Reply-To: <p6OcnTFAkOVreiL6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Le 27/02/2025 à 05:19, Ross Finlayson a écrit :

> 
> Division in complex numbers is opinionated, not unique.

:)
Hachel has a brother !

> 
> So, the natural products and alll their combinations
> don't necessarily arrive at "staying in the system".

wow

> 
> Furthermore, in things like Fourier-style analysis,
> which often enough employ numerical methods a.k.a.
> approximations here the small-angle approximation
> in their derivations, _always have a non-zero error_.

big time BS :)

> 
> Then, something like the "identity dimension", sees
> instead of going _out_ in the numbers, where complex
> numbers and their iterative products may neatly model
> reflections and rotations, instead go _in_ the numbers,
> making for the envelope of the linear fractional equation,
> Clairaut's and d'Alembert's equations, and otherwise
> with regards to _integral_ analysis vis-a-vis the
> _differential_ analysis.

Nonsense ala Hachel

> 
> These each have things the other can't implement,
> yet somehow they're part of one thing.
> 
> It's called completions since mathematics is replete.

A BS-philosophical version of Hachel. Let's park them together.

-- 
F.J.