Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vppmff$33mib$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: The weak kneed "doge" website
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 04:30:45 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vppmff$33mib$5@dont-email.me>
References: <0001HW.2D6EE57D037D4AAE305CAA38F@news.giganews.com> <vpnkg1$2lpns$2@dont-email.me> <0001HW.2D6FEA7203912EEA31015E38F@news.giganews.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:40:16 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c383fa75796df5da97c939a56147dcf9";
	logging-data="3267147"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WxP6+zkhUWsBhL6LTRMqrSCIFi0GLcd4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KODwcJy5nefiLwC6F2rtEbYvAO4=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
Bytes: 2584

plutedpup@outlook.com wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:54:09 -0800, BTR1701 wrote:
>> "Pluted Pup"<plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:

>> > https://doge.gov/ or Department Of Government Efficiency
>> >
>> > is quite a useless website that doesn't really
>> > qualify as a public government website, as it
>> > is just links to X-twitter, which is a
>> > members-only "website", very unlike what would be
>> > what would be more properly called a government
>> > website, not a closed access web-forum, like Facebook
>> > or Gab.
>> >
>> > Where is the actual intention to cut down waste?
>> >
>> > Let us pretend that USAID, for example, gave 90 million
>> > dollars to support homeless shelters for trans teens in
>> > El Salvador and you feel that that is an example of
>> > government waste. But how could you actually tell whether it is
>> > waste or not just because the premise seems wacky? Like with
>> > TV and movies, premise is easy, it's what you actually do
>> > and not what you said you intend to do that counts.
>>
>> Well, if the money was appropriated for homeless shelters for trans 
>> teens in El Salvador and you spend it on homeless shelters for trans 
>> teens in El Salvador, then that's prima facie waste since American 
>> taxpayers have no business funding homeless shelters for trans teens 
>> in El Salvador.
>
>Even if it's for national security? What if it's a
>honey trap to arrest middle-east terrorists?

Why are you so intently trying to rationalize gubberment waste and fraud?

Does an irrational hatred of Donal Trump have anything to do with it?

--
Not a joke! Don't jump!