Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vpps7v$34tq7$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bart <bc@freeuk.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:18:40 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <vpps7v$34tq7$1@dont-email.me> References: <vpkmq0$21php$1@dont-email.me> <vplhc7$26ur1$3@dont-email.me> <87v7swzzl7.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <vpn4qi$2j0hq$1@dont-email.me> <vpo20n$2o9ks$1@dont-email.me> <vpo7ec$2ovro$1@dont-email.me> <87a5a7k0ko.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:18:39 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c63d44fe64e4407b317d5d63cf1d70ab"; logging-data="3307335"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/q4f1VVzFtN1rV4Sek1aU+" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ihYh8HQ71/M8tswVBvwsX6CHXuE= In-Reply-To: <87a5a7k0ko.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> Content-Language: en-GB On 27/02/2025 12:56, Ar Rakin wrote: > bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > >> // isn't devoid of quirks (this is still C after all), for example: >> >> fopen(file,"rb"); // open file in \windows\system32\ >> fread(...); >> >> Here, the // line continues onto the next, so that the fread is >> commented out. But they are fewer. > > Interesting. Isn't this considered a compiler bug? It's to do with how C is defined, which requires that its implementation corresponds to series of phases. Then line-splicing, which combines two lines if the first ends with \, is done before processing // comments. I am aware that you > can do the same thing with strings like this: > > fprintf(stderr, "multi\ > line\ > strings\ > are fun."); > > I can understand how this might be useful; but with *comments*?? Was > that actually a thing in the official C standards? It's isn't that useful for strings; the following is simpler and also works: "multi" "line" "string" But it is needed for multi-line macros, as C's proprocessor is strictly line-oriented and a macro definition must fit onto one line. So lines spliced with \ can be used to combine multiple lines into one. A side-effect is that you can't use // comments for individual lines of a multi-line macro, it would screw things up. > To me it just feels like a compiler bug that was never fixed. To me the whole of C feels like one huge language bug! The way line splicing works has even weirder repercussions; any token can be split across lines: i\ n\ t abc; // split 'int' across 3 lines /\ / This is a '//' comment with // split across two lines /\ * This is a /* ... comment */ "ABC\\ nDEF" // A split string escape code if (a =\ = b) ... In fact, any C source file can be written with one character per line, plus the \ line continuation.