Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
 non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:16:20 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vppvk4$35jvb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <votq5o$ppgs$1@dont-email.me>
 <vouu57$12hqt$3@dont-email.me> <vp1jkg$1kstl$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp1qp1$1m05h$2@dont-email.me> <vp46l6$26r1n$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me> <vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me> <vp9ct8$3af6t$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpav34$3jct4$1@dont-email.me> <vpc3u9$3skb7$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpcsvk$irt$2@dont-email.me> <vpev2e$fgop$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpfmpp$j7qb$6@dont-email.me> <vphbnb$10gus$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpivp4$1fvqe$6@dont-email.me> <vpklrk$21jn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vplbnp$25vp2$5@dont-email.me>
 <b122ed1dc2c636321627d4dfc7936e463f920690@i2pn2.org>
 <vpltcn$28j3a$6@dont-email.me>
 <a8b150912bc326cd01c9e9ee89762d12b9fc571e@i2pn2.org>
 <vpm6hq$2dvrs$4@dont-email.me> <vpmo1m$2g3p0$3@dont-email.me>
 <vpn9m5$2jkdj$5@dont-email.me>
 <f556d553eddd6abf8673b902a2e0c51ded0e6423@i2pn2.org>
 <vporib$2vaf3$8@dont-email.me>
 <b68fedb0d778aaf1e4e06470cb520ea231035cfe@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:16:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="88d6e0d555344fd97069a3585b949a3d";
	logging-data="3330027"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19avCvKizneee0NM1OWJ2Gt"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DMdadkveQoAl/4yMHGG/lFMhMu0=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250227-6, 2/27/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <b68fedb0d778aaf1e4e06470cb520ea231035cfe@i2pn2.org>

On 2/27/2025 1:32 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:00:58 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> On 2/26/2025 5:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 2/26/25 9:49 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction,
>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,
>>>> You dodged the actual question.
>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.
>>> And you are missing the point that HHH can not correctly emulate 15
>>> line of this DD, as it is missing information and thus the task is
>>> improperly defined.
>> If we assume that HHH emulates the above machine code then there is NO
>> MORE relevant information needed and we know that machine address
>> 0000213c of DD is followed by machine address 00002133 of DD.
> Wrong. A call to an address should transfer the instruction pointer
> to that address.
> 

Yet when are asking for the execution trace of DD
and thus screening out the hundreds of pages of the
execution trace of HHH it is exactly how I said it.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer