| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vpqisk$38po7$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Who remembers how bad analogue television was? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:45:07 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 57 Message-ID: <vpqisk$38po7$1@dont-email.me> References: <m2a9coFaisuU1@mid.individual.net> <vpqg5t$389ar$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:45:09 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="052168c8cf9e588ccfae26430d72ece1"; logging-data="3434247"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fu+h3yFGbM4eqrebEuKCpdXcjzHNMrmhIoo3pGoezJA==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PvQJyWsZOYRODkwRkUfWUPHcU7I= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <vpqg5t$389ar$1@dont-email.me> On 27/02/2025 19:58, KevinJ93 wrote: > On 2/26/25 8:52 PM, Sylvia Else wrote: >> Leave aside the ghosting, which could largely be addressed by having a >> decent antenna. >> >> But my memory of a Philips Colour TV (1984ish) was that it had rubbish >> automatic gain control (AGC), and odd interactions between brightness >> and picture position. >> >> The AGC should have been based on the amplitude of the sync pulses, >> which was 30% of the total. I'm sure this could have been done, but my >> experience was that instead it was based on the average amplitude of >> the demodulated signal. A black image containing large white text, >> such as a title screen, would show a clear darkening to the sides of >> the text, while being decidedly grey over the rest of the screen. >> >> I suspect this same poor AGC was responsible for a shift in the >> detection of the sync pulse such that the text would be moved to the >> right of its proper position, which could result in distortion of the >> letters as the average brightness varied line by line. >> >> In the early days of television, using thermionic valves, it was >> probably a miracle that these things worked at all, but surely in the >> transistor age, something better could have been provided. >> >> Were studio monitors any better, anyone know? >> >> Sylvia. > > Are you sure that 1984 date is correct? By 1970 in the UK colour TVs > used transistor signal processing stages and many had already changed to > transistors for the power stages such as line and frame output as well > as using chopper stabilised power supplies. The first two colour TVs I recall owned by friends or family were about the time of Apollo 8 in 1968. Memorable for the Earth rise shot. Both were entirely valves and my uncle's caught fire leaving a nasty brown burn mark on their wool carpet and smoke damage on the ceiling. The earliest was at a school friends house and was in pastel shades pre Nd glass. It was in colour but only just... Joe 90 launch was the first programme I can recall watching there in colour. Test cards in shops don't count. I'd believe 1974 as a date for hybrid colour TVs that almost worked correctly and didn't need a service engineer visiting them every other week. By 1980 I'm pretty sure they were almost entirely semiconductor based. > Typically they used some form of gated AGC to not be affected by the > video modulation. I recall sound on vision being a bit of a problem too with certain types of check or dogtooth suits or other high contrast periodic fabrics. -- Martin Brown