Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vpqm2d$39d65$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:39:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vpqm2d$39d65$1@dont-email.me>
References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vd5195$edas$1@dont-email.me> <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad>
	<vd6vto$r0so$1@dont-email.me> <iJEJO.198176$kxD8.81657@fx11.iad>
	<3hOdnWpQ649QMGr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vd8doi$15q07$1@dont-email.me> <vd8eg7$15v1j$2@dont-email.me>
	<cxicnVzg_cn_eGX7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vdapbn$1kp35$5@dont-email.me> <lltpunF4fseU2@mid.individual.net>
	<1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net> <vde4b8$268qv$22@dont-email.me>
	<1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<wrapper-20241001111737@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
	<vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com>
	<c4acndn4jJXKwCP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<gIUvP.1415795$21T3.138928@fx18.iad> <vpp6b0$31cet$2@dont-email.me>
	<5DWdnXyIYo7er136nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
	<vppkbv$33b82$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:39:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5663112188f1f002c68c712720ef74d4";
	logging-data="3454149"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++tj0+btjbDFn9LNBMwBMu"
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w2jg3xaVLxhYSRtW7X1L1VNprjg=
Bytes: 3313

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:04:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

>> Ummmmmm ... SQL from *anything* isn't especially "pleasant'  🙂
> 
> It is if you restrict yourself to just a few library bits that work
> [well]

I think the most complex query I’ve done is a 7-way table join.

> I found out early that MySQL was really really good at very simple
> queries but was abominably slow at processing complex ones and it was
> better to not try and write the One True SQL statement, but several
> simple ones and  to manipulate the data in C afterwards.

Quite the opposite. One of my jobs is to maintain and continue development 
of a system written in PHP for a client by some previous developer who 
only knew ... PHP. One of the reports it generates is a list of hours 
worked over a range of dates. The original code did a separate query for 
each date in the range. So the longer the interval, the slower it went. 
(E.g. a query covering 6 months could get pretty painful.) I replaced that 
code with a single query over the entire date range, where my code looped 
over the result records and grouped them accordingly for output.

Result: much faster results -- even a query covering 6 months would appear 
in just a few seconds.

Moral: the more information you give the query optimizer, the more 
efficiently you will get results.