| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vprr5p$3ilgk$8@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:12:41 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 123 Message-ID: <vprr5p$3ilgk$8@dont-email.me> References: <f1vjrjda3bjinvk95eriko15qh4b6sar75@4ax.com> <slrnvrk20u.2jv.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <tddkrj9i0dqr3bucv9afkl1qa8pis2au8a@4ax.com> <slrnvrkg10.2ka.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <g0hkrjtk6aatgqtoaa26sjo4n9ftubpjsm@4ax.com> <slrnvrm8oq.2sq.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <iotmrjpsg4q54mn51l14p6n1emkpt8ljop@4ax.com> <slrnvrn25p.2rk.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <662nrjdfankavfplgh7am434t3u352m747@4ax.com> <slrnvrn2nh.2rk.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <6v2nrjdhjnis3psamdrll6t9sfl3bi8c6d@4ax.com> <slrnvrn7uo.5sq.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <_S_uP.306587$%5vf.244230@fx46.iad> <slrnvrpo6c.2ss.Adison@localhost.localdomain> <Mq9vP.1489693$ahU8.1184343@fx11.iad> <vpj8q3$1hqif$1@dont-email.me> <odkvP.162309$GJLe.122368@fx05.iad> <vpmhd0$2fgso$3@dont-email.me> <13FvP.471747$e6J1.274838@fx47.iad> <vpok2a$2qu6q$2@dont-email.me> <h51wP.598$46lc.436@fx17.iad> <vprqbm$3ilgk$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:12:42 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c4cf06f9c9f4678039fbb411c8cdf841"; logging-data="3757588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yX+KSfawqnYG5c4fRHby5" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6vXW+b+sUcNrVrHNvLDaIClwWO0= On 2025-02-28, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2025-02-27, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2/26/25 21:52, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-02-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> On 2025-02-26 2:55 a.m., RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-02-25, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-02-24 9:10 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:55:55 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you can still get Windows or MacOS >>>>>>>> running on the machine and it doesn't lock you out in any way, don't >>>>>>>> bother with Linux. It's fine, but it's not always worth the struggle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think people are habituated to the kind of struggles you need to get >>>>>>> Windows working, so they discount those compared to effort on a Linux >>>>>>> installation. Because Linux is less familiar (even though the >>>>>>> configuration setups are better understood), that is somehow seen as a >>>>>>> greater struggle. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not even that. Even if you have the patience to set Linux up >>>>>> properly, you'll find that a good amount of your hardware won't end up >>>>>> working. There are always people here and there who claim that they get >>>>>> it working, but when you follow their own instructions and the >>>>>> distribution they've used, you get different results. Heck, I followed >>>>>> the instructions to enable the hardware encryption of my nvme through >>>>>> Linux and, lo and behold, they didn't work. It works fine in Windows if >>>>>> you follow the instructions (which require you to have a separate >>>>>> Windows installation on a USB drive), but Linux won't even get past the >>>>>> unlocking stage. That is part of why a lot of us just stick to Windows >>>>>> or MacOS. >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't take much patience to install Linux. In twenty minutes it's >>>>> installed and fully updated for me — including most of the applications. >>>>> Can't do that with Windows hobbyware. (This depends on how fast your >>>>> Internet is — I'm moving soon so my Internet may soon be slower.) >>>> >>>> Updating Linux is definitely faster than MacOS. On this machine, simply >>>> updating from 12.7.4 to 12.7.6 took an hour. It is definitely not >>>> because the Internet connection is slow either (I get 1.5Gbps at home). >>> >>> Same experience I've had when updating MacOS (on "1 GB" i.e., 750 Mbps >>> Internet). I compiled a wxPython "wheel" for Trelby on that Mini (in the Mac >>> OS side) and it took over five days. (I thought it had quit working, but >>> I just let it go and it eventually finished. I had upgraded wxPython and >>> thought would fix the cursor issue (it doesn't stay with what you type) but >>> it worked exactly the same. I think the programming has to be changed for >>> Mac OS but nobody who is on the Trelby GitHub owns a Mac computer (I don't >>> think they do, anyhow). >>> >>> Mac OS updates seem even slower than Windows updates, but this is an old >>> machine — still it has 16 GBs of RAM, it should be faster than it is. >> >> In my short experience with this MacBook, I'm realizing that there is >> really no good reason to buy a Mac unless you consciously want to change >> your computer every two or three years. A 2017 Mac is no longer >> supported in 2025. Meanwhile, any computer capable of running Windows 10 >> will be supported at least until the end of this year. One gives you >> seven years of support, the other gives you a decade. Meanwhile, _every_ >> PC can install Linux once the support ends. Macs from 2020 on don't have >> that luxury. Heck, I'm reading that Macs from 2018 on have trouble to do >> so because of the T2 chip. > > I went through the trouble of updating the Mac Mini 2012 to Monterey using > OpenCore, but I hardly ever boot it. Mostly just to test a couple > applications and to see if I can get Trelby working on it — almost, but not > there. I think it's at the point that I need to know a lot more about Python > than I'll ever learn. > >>>>>> I just got my 2017 MacBook Air with MacOS Monterey yesterday. I am >>>>>> surprised that most of the software I need installs fine (except >>>>>> Microsoft Office 365 which requires at least MacOS 13), and the hardware >>>>>> is in perfect order. The SSD still has 75% health, the inside of the >>>>>> laptop was fairly clean, HDMI sound somehow works through a >>>>>> mini-DisplayPort to HDMI adapter and suspend/wake works as it should. >>>>>> There is no reason to install Linux on this, an eight-year-old Mac I got >>>>>> for $150. Considering that, I now wonder what hardware is a candidate >>>>>> for Linux. >>>>> >>>>> My 2012 Mac Mini works fine with Linux Mint 21.3. I dual boot it with Mac >>>>> Monterey (using OpenCore). I guess Monterey is now also outdated. I hear >>>>> that Ventura is a step too far for these old machines — so this Mac will >>>>> probably never be up to date again on the Mac side. On the Linux side I can >>>>> probably keep updating it for another ten years. >>>>> >>>>> So you're back in the Mac fold? (You're almost as "computer restless" as I >>>>> am.) >>>> >>>> I'm definitely not on the Mac side. I just got this machine by offering >>>> very little for an old machine on eBay. The guy wanted $200 for a 2017 >>>> MacBook Air with two chargers, and I offered $150 as a joke to see if he >>>> would accept it, given the age of the machine. Surprisingly, he took it. >>>> Older machines than this one are selling for more on the site. When I >>>> realized that I had purchased it, I figured I might as well make use of >>>> it at work instead of constantly bringing my main laptop in. As old as >>>> it is, it still manages to do what I need in the classroom. If Apple >>>> annoys me about how outdated this system is, I'll simply put Linux on >>>> it. For the time being, I'm keeping it as is. >>> >>> I own a 2015 MacBook Air that I keep planning to sell, but never get around >>> to doing it. I've pretty much waited to the point where it has almost zero >>> value now. They were well made, I'll give Apple that — though too damn >>> slick, It keeps wanting to slip out of my hands. That, and the fact that the >>> metal is soft is probably why so many of them have dented corners (this one >>> doesn't). It has 8 GBs of RAM and a 128 GB SSD, now running Monterey (I >>> think it was faster under Catalina). I think Apple figured you >>> would use their cloud, which I don't (kind of like Google figuring you would >>> use their cloud on Chromebooks, which I don't). >>> >>> I'm pretty sure the 2017 MacBook Air will work well for you (if you can >>> stand its "wonky" UI, which I just don't like). >> >> Well, if you want to put Linux on there, I can tell you that it's >> running fine at the moment. Ubuntu doesn't appear to freeze on this >> hardware the way that it always did on the Zephyrus with NVIDIA. > > With an Intel GPU, I'm guessing it will be solid. Apparently nVidia is > krytonite to Linux. "kryptonite" sp? — It looks like I (at least) left out a "p". -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien