| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vpsva5$3pinb$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Equation complexe Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:29:24 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <vpsva5$3pinb$1@dont-email.me> References: <oAvE_mEWK82aUJOdwpGna1Rzs1U@jntp> <vpnsfu$2n5d5$1@dont-email.me> <Tq4dwAOZX1tWsyzfsUwTEFiN88E@jntp> <addb511a5b7d5d35714ea86bde81bdb29964d87f@i2pn2.org> <rTIYgKby2LChwmei9nhXnUkhEPg@jntp> <vpqttm$3atmj$2@dont-email.me> <aIxvXmQLX8FyCEyEpPGH07SYMio@jntp> <vpr45p$3bm47$1@dont-email.me> <H-zHCnTXCzbQlG8eXiMgL2-dr68@jntp> <vpr6o8$3bm47$2@dont-email.me> <agtexzK1pRJiEVerB6Eow6hkMn0@jntp> <vpsd0a$3m43u$1@dont-email.me> <vpsgv8$3mrv5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 19:29:26 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cad7a6177c2179808129aff139dbb464"; logging-data="3984107"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18oJL23OV19Wo0xOUjETPNLLEYRylFJM9M=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:rKS1sWzP4uoWPJAWZh/dvBxf0QM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vpsgv8$3mrv5$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2001 On 2/28/2025 6:24 AM, Moebius wrote: > Am 28.02.2025 um 14:16 schrieb sobriquet: > >> So basically you're saying >> >> -1 * -1 = -1 > > From this we get (with division by -1 on both sides): > > -1 = 1. > > And from this (with addition of 1 on both sides): > > 0 = 2 . > > Division by 2 gives: > > 0 = 1 . > > That's a fine result! > > Moreover it implies > > 1 * 1 = 0 * 0 = 0 = 2 . > > Just as you said: > > "Your approach to math closely resembles Terrence Howard who claims > > 1 * 1 = 2." > > > > Ditto.