Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::2!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Climate models are wrong.
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:46:43 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID: <vpt7bj$epg$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <61fd7c93-15b9-abc0-7c98-065a570208b1@example.net> <uup2sjpoidji4tmir7jg260fbb34u30tgf@4ax.com> <vpsvai$3pjea$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::2";
	logging-data="23344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"

William Hyde  <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>Not so one of our graduate students.  He ripped into the speaker quite 
>fiercely, giving no quarter.  The calculations given, he said, would 
>without doubt include some stratospheric signal in their "mid 
>tropospheric" temperature estimates.  And as the stratosphere was known 
>to be cooling, this would seriously compromise their accuracy.  Every 
>argument the speaker raised was shot down.  It was a massacre.

1. Did he get his degree?
2. Would he like to work in stratospheric wind analysis for aviation safety?
   We may have some positions open soon.

--scott

-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."