Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vptb6n$3r2n0$15@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:52:24 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <vptb6n$3r2n0$15@dont-email.me> References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com> <vpl91g$25q46$1@dont-email.me> <1976765442.762208809.808387.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <20250225130315.00004e34@gmail.com> <lhqvP.1323465$if26.592741@fx13.iad> <1924764604.762215659.468999.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <ICydnfxPt7ZuOCP6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mddmse88bug.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <vpseev$b5go$1@paganini.bofh.team> <mMjwP.9$7xi4.1@fx43.iad> <vpss6r$brsl$1@paganini.bofh.team> <87mse5zyn8.fsf@eder.anydns.info> <vpt7q7$3r2n0$2@dont-email.me> <20250228132017.00005dbb@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:52:24 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="15a5a1eba7c56e832699653689652217"; logging-data="4033248"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184BW8uueM+DpLhoH6YuTTL" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:n9WkfjCCw6pWB1je7UgTpninIuY= Bytes: 2519 On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:20:17 -0800, John Ames wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:54:32 -0000 (UTC) > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 19:56:27 +0100, Andreas Eder wrote: >> >> > It is 4KW. 4096 = 1024 * 4 = 4 * 2^10. >> >> That’s 4kiW. Kibiwords, not kilowords. > > If you care enough to bother differentiating, sure. The whole issue was downright sloppy. And it got worse as the amounts of storage involved got larger. For k versus ki, the difference is about 2½%; for M versus Mi, it doubles to about 5%; for G versus Gi, it’s close to 7½%, and so on. You don’t see the difference as important? It actually led to lawsuits against hard drive manufacturers over what were the actual capacities of the drives they were selling, versus what was advertised. Still think it wasn’t important? This is why SI introduced the binary prefixes, to differentiate the two.