Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most?
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 01:02:36 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vptmbc$3thh5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vpkmq0$21php$1@dont-email.me> <vpl62m$250af$1@dont-email.me>
 <87frk10w51.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <vpn8vs$2jmv1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpn92i$86q$1@reader1.panix.com> <vpnfmn$2ksdj$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpni33$2ld5k$1@dont-email.me> <vpnrld$2mq8h$2@dont-email.me>
 <vpourn$30a9h$1@dont-email.me> <vpq1es$35inm$1@dont-email.me>
 <vprtvs$3jfqu$1@dont-email.me> <vps85m$3l1rq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vps9nd$3li98$1@dont-email.me> <vpt8o7$3r2n0$8@dont-email.me>
 <vpth2d$3sm80$1@dont-email.me> <vpti32$3skv2$2@dont-email.me>
 <87o6ylobba.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 02:02:36 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a5c5c89e5e8325ce2abb3ec7b9bec80";
	logging-data="4113957"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++1qbccWfm1FXcp9uiREjPXPebtOUeMhM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c/IS3OMYQOx0+8e9Cr1p3I0CS58=
In-Reply-To: <87o6ylobba.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 3062

On 01/03/2025 00:15, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:
>> On 28/02/2025 23:32, Richard Harnden wrote:
>>> On 28/02/2025 21:10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:21:01 +0000, Richard Harnden wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have your mental margin-bell ding at around 75 characters ...
>>>>
>>>> What was the ding for? Was it because typists were not in the habit
>>>> of
>>>> looking at what they were typing?
>>> Exactly.  They didn't need to look at what they were typing, because
>>> they could touch-type.  It's why the F and J keys have the little
>>> bumps - so you'd know where you were.  They'd be looking only at
>>> what they where copying, so the audible cue was necessary.  They
>>> could hit 90+ words per minute.
>>> Very impressive, but not a skill a programmer needs.
>>
>> MMMV.
>>
>> You do you, obviously, but touch-typing can easily double your typing
>> speed. It never ceases to amaze me that the NHS claims their doctors
>> are overworked but can't be arsed to teach them to touch-type.
> 
> I suspect two different points are being made.  Touch-typing without
> looking at the keyboard is important for programmers.  Touch-typing
> without looking at the text being typed is less so.
> 

Yes.  I don't need to look at my fingers/the keyboard, but I do need to 
concentrate on the code.  Give me a azerty layout and I'm back to one 
finger and searching.