Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86
 code
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 10:33:43 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <vpvcta$a44l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vptlfu$3st19$9@dont-email.me>
 <d128909f1359b48293dd1823d22d671435d5640c@i2pn2.org>
 <vpv6ad$8sdm$1@dont-email.me> <vpv9o6$8k7n$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2025 17:33:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fdbf626a1258567b9f15bdc6edf7b86a";
	logging-data="331925"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Lq0a7rpHfDDHjnNqBnveC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YuE1gINOUhYOlgzkd7wyNCWAKc0=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250301-4, 3/1/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vpv9o6$8k7n$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3449

On 3/1/2025 9:39 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 01.mrt.2025 om 15:41 schreef olcott:
>> On 3/1/2025 6:49 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 2/28/25 7:47 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> _DD()
>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
>>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
>>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>>> [00002155] c3         ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>>
>>>> When we hypothesize that the code at machine address
>>>> 0000213c is an x86 emulator then we know that DD
>>>> remains stuck in recursive emulation and cannot possibly
>>>> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>
>>>> When we add the additional complexity that HHH also
>>>> aborts this sequence at some point then every level
>>>> of recursive emulation immediately stops. This does
>>>> not enable any DD to ever reach its "ret" instruction.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But then you just negated your first assumption, as a partial 
>>> emulator that aborts its emulation, then DD no longer gets stuck.
>>>
>>
>> Cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
> proves failure of HHH to reach the end of a proven terminating program.

DD emulated by HHH according to the above x86 machine code of DD
cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
NO MATTER WHAT. Asserting otherwise has always been the straw-man
deception of referring to something other than DD emulated by HHH.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer