Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vq075c$eljf$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 18:01:47 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 75 Message-ID: <vq075c$eljf$3@dont-email.me> References: <vptlfu$3st19$9@dont-email.me> <vpug3h$50td$1@dont-email.me> <vq06al$eljf$1@dont-email.me> <vq06ja$dfve$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:01:48 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a4c634d78a3c572e27d924fefebd45f"; logging-data="480879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19d3uku3sqcHHAGvAgHtXSF" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:G2/JT6QM6vPvfXXUyye81gO8WZ4= In-Reply-To: <vq06ja$dfve$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250301-6, 3/1/2025), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 4146 On 3/1/2025 5:52 PM, dbush wrote: > On 3/1/2025 6:47 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 3/1/2025 2:22 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2025-03-01 00:47:58 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> _DD() >>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local >>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax >>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f >>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d >>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp >>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp >>>> [00002155] c3 ret >>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>>> >>>> When we hypothesize that the code at machine address >>>> 0000213c is an x86 emulator then we know that DD >>>> remains stuck in recursive emulation and cannot possibly >>>> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally. >>> >>> The emulator itself is stuck and cannot return normally but it doesn't >>> know it cannot return normally. At some point it runs out of memory >>> and terminates normally or abnormally. >>> >> >> Yes you are correct about this sub-step of two steps. >> >>>> When we add the additional complexity that HHH also >>>> aborts this sequence at some point then every level >>>> of recursive emulation immediately stops. This does >>>> not enable any DD to ever reach its "ret" instruction. >>> >>> When we add an additional complexity we must note that there are other >>> additional complexities that could be added instead. >>> >> >> Sure we could carefully examine every detail about the price >> of tea in China. >> >> When we are answering the question that seems impossible for >> anyone here to pay attention to even when repeated hundreds of times: >> >> Can the above DD correctly emulated by HHH possibly >> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally? >> >> The answer is dead obviously "no" for everyone that is: >> (a) Technically competent >> and >> (b) Not deliberately deceptive. > > And by the same logic, no_numbers_greater_than_10 correctly emulated by > F cannot reach its own "ret" instruction, leading to the conclusion that > there are no natural numbers greater than 10, and you are on record as > admitting this is correct. > By this exact same reasoning the following function void dbush_is-a-stupid_fool() { return; } Proves that dbush is a stupid fool. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer