Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vq075c$eljf$3@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vq075c$eljf$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86
 code
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 18:01:47 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <vq075c$eljf$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vptlfu$3st19$9@dont-email.me> <vpug3h$50td$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq06al$eljf$1@dont-email.me> <vq06ja$dfve$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 01:01:48 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a4c634d78a3c572e27d924fefebd45f";
	logging-data="480879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19d3uku3sqcHHAGvAgHtXSF"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:G2/JT6QM6vPvfXXUyye81gO8WZ4=
In-Reply-To: <vq06ja$dfve$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250301-6, 3/1/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 4146

On 3/1/2025 5:52 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/1/2025 6:47 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/1/2025 2:22 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-03-01 00:47:58 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> _DD()
>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
>>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
>>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>>> [00002155] c3         ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>>
>>>> When we hypothesize that the code at machine address
>>>> 0000213c is an x86 emulator then we know that DD
>>>> remains stuck in recursive emulation and cannot possibly
>>>> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>>>
>>> The emulator itself is stuck and cannot return normally but it doesn't
>>> know it cannot return normally. At some point it runs out of memory
>>> and terminates normally or abnormally.
>>>
>>
>> Yes you are correct about this sub-step of two steps.
>>
>>>> When we add the additional complexity that HHH also
>>>> aborts this sequence at some point then every level
>>>> of recursive emulation immediately stops. This does
>>>> not enable any DD to ever reach its "ret" instruction.
>>>
>>> When we add an additional complexity we must note that there are other
>>> additional complexities that could be added instead.
>>>
>>
>> Sure we could carefully examine every detail about the price
>> of tea in China.
>>
>> When we are answering the question that seems impossible for
>> anyone here to pay attention to even when repeated hundreds of times:
>>
>> Can the above DD correctly emulated by HHH possibly
>> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally?
>>
>> The answer is dead obviously "no" for everyone that is:
>> (a) Technically competent
>>    and
>> (b) Not deliberately deceptive.
> 
> And by the same logic, no_numbers_greater_than_10 correctly emulated by 
> F cannot reach its own "ret" instruction, leading to the conclusion that 
> there are no natural numbers greater than 10, and you are on record as 
> admitting this is correct.
> 

By this exact same reasoning the following function

void dbush_is-a-stupid_fool()
{
   return;
}

Proves that dbush is a stupid fool.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer