Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vq1vt2$r25v$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Getting old is not for sissies Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 10:10:08 -0600 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 75 Message-ID: <vq1vt2$r25v$1@dont-email.me> References: <vpslph$3noh2$1@dont-email.me> <vpsncj$3o02g$1@dont-email.me> <gjmwP.3138$SZca.1726@fx13.iad> <vpsrss$3om5n$1@dont-email.me> <0jt3sj9iofpo2ru3abmi7ddrt4uk5btc9t@4ax.com> <vpta8s$3rj0t$1@dont-email.me> <j2d4sj1ju5h4qj8l64v92jp2pbfg44podl@4ax.com> <vpthh1$3spru$2@dont-email.me> <eci4sj1ppvglfuut24ahtdg789fkd2v3mj@4ax.com> <vpv2to$848g$1@dont-email.me> <47h6sjdvehovbadru4cv210eha609mospn@4ax.com> <vpvl7m$akr9$11@dont-email.me> <oku6sjpg12tdoqdnp1hlep69c2lj6315i4@4ax.com> <vq0efb$fo2q$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 17:10:12 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d715ff594fa60a677ff613b3a08aeb00"; logging-data="886975"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VgyU1s0VUBy031c9W0RMJ" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:yb/5xJhfLHUw128GpHLt9l5YxkY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vq0efb$fo2q$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4264 On 3/1/2025 8:06 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: > On 3/1/2025 4:39 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 13:55:50 -0500, Frank Krygowski >> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> IIRC, hydrostatic transmissions are standard features on >>> zero turn >>> mowers. But as you noted, the mechanical efficiency is >>> lousy. That's not >>> a concern if you have a big enough engine and low enough >>> use hours. It's >>> a huge concern for a cyclist. >> >> True, but the huge concern is mostly for racing. If >> you're using the >> bicycle as a moving exercise machine, the added weight and >> increased >> friction might even be considered beneficial. It's like >> the weights >> on barbells where light weight is not a concern. For >> competitive >> fixie racing, maybe the governing organization should >> specify a >> minimum allowable bicycle weight, which might inspire >> technical >> innovation instead of shaving grams off the bicycle weight. > > I think that level of inefficiency would be a concern of > most cyclists, and very few actually race. It would take a > lot of fun out of riding. > > I once worked on a bicycle belonging to a friend that had a > quite rare (at least, at the time) 5 speed Sturmey-Archer > geared hub. IIRC, there were two shift cables, one going to > each side. Anyway, as I remember when shifted to its lowest > gear it seemed extremely sluggish. Unlike the equivalent low > gear on a derailleur bike, it really didn't seem much easier > going uphill in that gear. Instead it just seemed slower. > And as I recall, that was a not uncommon complaint about > that particular hub. > > I understand the desire for exercise. But I think almost > everyone prefers to get their exercise while moving farther > or faster, not by slogging along slowly. If that were > acceptable, we'd all be riding solid tires. > > Odd symptom and no logical reason for it IMHO. The S-5 gearbox (went through several variants) is basically an AW three speed design with dual sun gears. With no left side change, it's a three speed (+26.6% high, direct drive, -21.1% low). When the left side is changed, the sun gear clutch slides over to the other gear set, giving -33.3% super low, direct drive and +50% high. The gear sizes being different from an AW (-25% low, direct drive, +33% high), the five model notably gives a faster high gear but not a lower low gear. Since everything is in the same oil bath* and rolling on the same bearing adjustment*, overall efficiency should vary only in the relative losses of gear diameter which is a small difference. * can be correct or deficient -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971