Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers
 are wrong
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 10:48:06 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vq2246$r6p7$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vq1qnr$q7t4$3@dont-email.me>
 <f0be934f2a26969e435b81050738f0960d4eb366@i2pn2.org>
 <vq1uqs$r6p7$2@dont-email.me>
 <e7868f47c94b8edcc6fcf2b224e8ac5ea8a2fa7c@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 17:48:07 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1890a324b06dc16a921f95b9719194f";
	logging-data="891687"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+n5dbOdlXJfhtGzSeVRoqu"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g6eEr3tH6OP3g6dzogC6XiTuCMc=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250302-0, 3/1/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <e7868f47c94b8edcc6fcf2b224e8ac5ea8a2fa7c@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3055

On 3/2/2025 10:22 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 09:51:56 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> On 3/2/2025 8:55 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 08:42:03 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>
>>>> I challenged everyone here to provide the machine address by machine
>>>> address (AKA line by line) execution trace of DD correctly emulated by
>>>> HHH that reaches its own "ret" instruction.
>>>> No one made any attempt to do this because they know that this would
>>>> prove that they are stupidly wrong to say that my trace is incorrect.
>>> I did, on thursday at 9pm UTC.
>>>
>> I am asking for a sequence of 10 hexadecimal integer machine addresses
>> of DD correctly emulated by HHH.

> See that post.
> 

Do you not know what a hexadecimal integer machine address is?

From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies
  non-terminating behavior to HHH
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:00:06 -0000 (UTC)

On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote:
 > Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH, because it doesn't call DD in turn,

Is counterfactual The actual HHH does emulate itself emulating DD
as a 100% totally verified fact.

That you cannot understand that this code proves that is not my mistake.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c

 > we continue with 2141 until the conditional jump, whereupon we
 > either enter an infinite loop (which is more than 15 instructions)
 > or proceed to return (which is 13 instructions), depending on the
 > return value of HHH.
 >

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer