Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers
 are wrong [2]
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 13:27:34 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vq2bf7$tgu6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vo6420$3mpmf$1@dont-email.me> <vp46l6$26r1n$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp5t55$2gt2s$1@dont-email.me> <vp6pmb$2opvi$1@dont-email.me>
 <vp8700$30tdq$1@dont-email.me> <vp9ct8$3af6t$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpav34$3jct4$1@dont-email.me> <vpc3u9$3skb7$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpcsvk$irt$2@dont-email.me> <vpev2e$fgop$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpfmpp$j7qb$6@dont-email.me> <vphbnb$10gus$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpivp4$1fvqe$6@dont-email.me> <vpklrk$21jn9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vplbnp$25vp2$5@dont-email.me>
 <b122ed1dc2c636321627d4dfc7936e463f920690@i2pn2.org>
 <vpltcn$28j3a$6@dont-email.me>
 <a8b150912bc326cd01c9e9ee89762d12b9fc571e@i2pn2.org>
 <vpm6hq$2dvrs$4@dont-email.me> <vpmo1m$2g3p0$3@dont-email.me>
 <vpn9m5$2jkdj$5@dont-email.me>
 <a686628c3dd1a48f5dcb8288e69758325782daa6@i2pn2.org>
 <vpoqbj$2vaf3$4@dont-email.me> <vppbmb$323f6$2@dont-email.me>
 <vpqd41$37v45$2@dont-email.me>
 <032b4871d813d3a0ff4dc7dcbf50cb6f2f26550b@i2pn2.org>
 <vq233j$ru20$1@dont-email.me>
 <119e547c3e83ba976982163b6dcae24281ac168e@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2025 20:27:35 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1890a324b06dc16a921f95b9719194f";
	logging-data="967622"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+152sp8eALEQRtTqpcvT9"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bXX/EnAfSJsk7d6ygVCl4PYOeCU=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <119e547c3e83ba976982163b6dcae24281ac168e@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250302-6, 3/2/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 4662

On 3/2/2025 1:19 PM, joes wrote:
> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 11:04:51 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> On 2/27/2025 3:00 PM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:06:41 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation
>>>>>>>>>> being incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation
>>>>>>>>>> sequence long ago.
>>>>>>>>>> What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?
>>>>>>>>> The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th
>>>>>>>>> instruction,
>>>>>>>>> the 'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,
>>>>>>>> What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>> There can be no correct continuation.
>>>>>> If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.
>>>>> HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is.
>>>> That dishonestly dodged the original question:
>>>> What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH?
>>> Look at what HHH1 does.
>>>
>>>> _DD()
>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping [00002134] 8bec
>>>>    mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping [00002136] 51         push ecx      ;
>>>> make space for local [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04 [00002144] 8945fc     mov
>>>> [ebp-04],eax [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 [0000214b]
>>>> 7402       jz 0000214f [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d [0000214f]
>>>> 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>>> [00002155] c3         ret Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>
>>> Anyway: ignoring the call to HHH
>> It moronically stupid unless HHH ignores this call and HHH does not
>> ignore this call.

> You didn't ask for the trace of HHH.
> 

OK I will simplify for you.
I want the execution trace of DD and only DD for its
first 10 instructions and this must include the execution
trace of DD emulated by HHH emulating itself.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer