Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception
 out on its ass
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:02:23 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <vq4cpe$1b4no$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq2i40$ug75$3@dont-email.me>
 <aff6ceb585b4f024c238d901362389163051aac8@i2pn2.org>
 <vq2jpi$ug75$4@dont-email.me>
 <a5881effb7ea9a41f6e94ad6262ccd48d9e09cf3@i2pn2.org>
 <vq33oq$11qv8$1@dont-email.me>
 <cf64074c718d487c7610a4cca877b88d953452f5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq3al4$16jdc$1@dont-email.me>
 <2824dfe17546e8aa501065961baafb0375a1c296@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:02:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="857f72aa048ba693cb278272de72c0d5";
	logging-data="1413880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pSHgHFVOWAgxMbGcQYXdf"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PgcUAPgDnqy0+bhQcssqZmzvTPg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <2824dfe17546e8aa501065961baafb0375a1c296@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250303-2, 3/3/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 3352

On 3/3/2025 2:24 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 22:19:48 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> On 3/2/2025 9:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 3/2/25 9:22 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/2/2025 6:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 3/2/25 4:49 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/2/2025 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/2/25 4:21 PM, olcott wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> WHich only shows that HHH can not correctly emulate its input and
>>>>>>> give an answer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that HHH does correctly determine that DD emulated by HHH
>>>>>> cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally proves that your claim is counter
>>>>>> factual.
>>>>>
>>>>> You say that, but it isn't true,
>>>>
>>>> You keep trying to get away with saying that the fact that DD calls
>>>> its own emulator in recursive emulation does not change the behavior
>>>> from the behavior of the directly executed DD.
> Obviously. DD is fixed.
> 
>>> And you keep on making the claim without evidence!!!!
>>> What instruction acted differently between the to, that was directly
>>> executied and correctly emulated to different results.
>>>
>> The call to HHH(DD) from the directly executed DD returns to DD. The
>> call to HHH(DD) from DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly return
>> BECAUSE IT CALLS ITS OWN EMULATOR.
> Which proves that HHH can't simulate itself, since the rest is the same.
> 

That your technical skills are insufficient to understand
the code that conclusively proves that HHH does emulate
itself emulating DD

https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c

Is far less than no rebuttal at all.

>> I never said it that clearly ever before.
> Maybe you should have.
> 


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer