Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Salary Templates if you "Grok" ML / AI [PhDs Negotiate Salaries] (Re:
 Prolog Education Group clueless about the AI Boom?)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 18:03:11 +0100
Message-ID: <vq4nce$109t7$1@solani.org>
References: <vq4a7g$10843$1@solani.org> <vq4aae$10843$2@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 17:03:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1058727"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EykEL5tNHIGUlxSkkB0rVnzo77M=
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BL5QtUThjFv4TdhUHwpSPgsbHGcuXhA9HposJryM/0cTCW1Yw+egLllVOzd1sjKNZn3g9FpBVT
In-Reply-To: <vq4aae$10843$2@solani.org>
Bytes: 3864
Lines: 87

Hi,

Salary Templates if you "Grok" ML / AI [PhDs negotiate salaries]:

Tendency to go towards 500'000.- USD per year
https://x.com/chiefaioffice/status/1734329284821672270

But I guess you need to have the talent to train a ChatGPT.
Still very rare, I had interesting discussions on the internet.

LoL

Bye

         Final Annual	Initial	Negotiated
Company	Compensation	Compensation	Delta
OpenAl	$865K	$665K	30%
Anthropic	$855K	$855K	0%
Inflection*	$825K	NA	NA
Tesla	$780K	$702K	11%
Amazon	$719K	$520K	38%
Google Brain	$695K	$590K	17%
TikTok	$605K	$430K	40%
FAIR	$556K	$480K	15%
Google Research	$549K	$310K	77%
Waymo	$530K	$385K	37%
Deepmind	$515K	$452K	13%
Bloomberg Al	$460K	$318K	44%
Apple	$450K	$337K	33%
Microsoft Research	$449K	$270K	66%
Salesforce Research	$441K	$355K	24%
Toyota Research	$410K	$370K	10%
Twitter	$409K	$359K	13%
NVIDIA	$390K	$340K	14%
IBM Research	$377K	$262K	43%
Allen Institute	$350K	$310K	12%
Samsung Research	$285K	$240K	18%
Hugging Face	$238K	$185K	27%

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> My suspicion, teaching WalkSAT as an altermative
> to DPLL, and show its limitations would maybe give
> more bang. We are currently entering an era that
> already started in the end of 1990
> 
> when some new probabilistic complexity classes
> were defined. Many machine learning techniques
> have also such an aspect, and it will only get
> worse with Quantum Computing. Having
> 
> a grip on these things helps also distinguishing
> when a AI acts by chance, or whether it diverts from
> chance and shows some excelling adaptation to the
> problem domain at hand. Like here,
> 
> anybody an idea what they mean by “above chance”?
> 
> Intuitive physics understanding emerges from
> self-supervised pretraining on natural videos
> https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11831
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Concerning this boring nonsense:
>>
>> https://book.simply-logical.space/src/text/2_part_ii/5.3.html#
>>
>> Funny idea that anybody would be interested just now in
>> the year 2025 in things like teaching breadth first
>> search versus depth first search, or even be “mystified”
>> by such stuff. Its extremly trivial stuff:
>>
>> Insert your favorite tree traversal pictures here.
>>
>> Its even not artificial intelligence neither has anything
>> to do with mathematical logic, rather belongs to computer
>> science and discrete mathematics which you have in
>> 1st year university
>>
>> courses, making it moot to call it “simply logical”. It
>> reminds me of the idea of teaching how wax candles work
>> to dumb down students, when just light bulbs have been
>> invented. If this is the outcome
>>
>> of the Prolog Education Group 2.0, then good night.
>>
>