Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Python recompile
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 17:28:00 +0000
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vq4or0$1dbo2$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq260p$u8ub$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <vq2j3n$v2fk$1@dont-email.me> <vq4ocv$17dal$1@paganini.bofh.team>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:28:01 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b02481f3a7dc8fbf4010d6409a14e930";
	logging-data="1486594"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18J/Ch/LXqnKr5p4YZBqzAUSAkhPkWDHybgDAgUAYdHuA=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DlprQDxvyrCRkBwK6dI6eFsR8kE=
In-Reply-To: <vq4ocv$17dal$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 1838

On 03/03/2025 17:20, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> In comp.lang.c James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:

<snip>

>> However Python is NOT an implementation of C, not even by the loosest
>> reasonable interpretation, so why should it be discussed here?.
> 
> The question is about C implementation.  Namely, the bible for
> this group, that is C standard requires C implementation to
> produce executables.

So you agree that C /interpreters/ are off-topic here.

It's a start.

<snip>

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within