Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Apple has an excuse for why the iPhone 16e doesn't include
 MagSafe
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 09:29:59 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vq4oun$1ddf2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vptkjo$17jh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:30:00 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5b2d3cc66ae3c316f45d7033ada126f";
	logging-data="1488354"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5rsbKOld+Mwgt4kNh7ZQqr3jwcGeA2rQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3p7DR5GHndOKNH7TBGYFnSNrAAQ=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <vptkjo$17jh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Bytes: 1832

On 2025-02-28 16:32, Marion wrote:
> Apple has an excuse for why the iPhone 16e doesn't include MagSafe, and 
> it's the same one that we've seen nospam claim for the past decade.
> 
> In addition to the laughably pathetic iPhone 16e battery capacity, Apple
> has offered an excuse for why the iPhone 16e doesn't include MagSafe.
> <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/02/28/apple-provides-reason-iphone-16e- 
> no-magsafe/>
> 
> Apple says MagSafe is "not needed" & "not wanted" when they offer the
> excuse that "most people in the iPhone 16e's target audience exclusively
> charge their phones by plugging them into a charging cable", according to

My reaction is...

....who the HELL CARES?

Apple is free to offer any product it wants.