Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vq5epa$10cem$1@news.xmission.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.snarked.org!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail
From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Python recompile
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:42:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID: <vq5epa$10cem$1@news.xmission.com>
References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq4l3d$1ck9e$1@dont-email.me> <vq4m0u$1ctpn$1@dont-email.me> <vq4n05$1d5dv$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:42:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4";
	logging-data="1061334"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Bytes: 2143
Lines: 35

In article <vq4n05$1d5dv$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:39:58 -0500
>James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wibbled:
>>On 3/3/25 11:24, geodandw wrote:
>>> On 3/3/25 10:22, James Kuyper wrote:
>>>> On 03/03/2025 08:13, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
>>....
>>>>>  That sounds like a C issue to me.
>>>>
>>>> If it were a C problem, then the C source code that produced the problem
>>>> should have been shown. It's hard to debug code that you can't see.
>>> Why is this group so intolerant?
>>
>>Because what you call intolerance, we call topicality. When you post a
>>message to a group where it is on-topic, the message gets seen and
>
>Only an arrogant idiot would think that errors on linking object files
>generated by a C compiler are not relevant in a C language group.
>
>

Indeed.  And as you see, there is no shortage of arrogant idiots in
comp.lang.c

'Tis always been thus, and always will be.

BTW, I note that this thread is (still!) posted to 2 other groups, besides
CLC, but the main topic of discussion in the thread (the usual topicality
BS) is, of course, only relevant to CLC.

Funny, that.


-- 
The book "1984" used to be a cautionary tale;
Now it is a "how-to" manual.