Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vq5epa$10cem$1@news.xmission.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.snarked.org!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:42:34 -0000 (UTC) Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium Message-ID: <vq5epa$10cem$1@news.xmission.com> References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq4l3d$1ck9e$1@dont-email.me> <vq4m0u$1ctpn$1@dont-email.me> <vq4n05$1d5dv$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 23:42:34 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4"; logging-data="1061334"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) Bytes: 2143 Lines: 35 In article <vq4n05$1d5dv$1@dont-email.me>, <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote: >On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:39:58 -0500 >James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wibbled: >>On 3/3/25 11:24, geodandw wrote: >>> On 3/3/25 10:22, James Kuyper wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2025 08:13, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote: >>.... >>>>> That sounds like a C issue to me. >>>> >>>> If it were a C problem, then the C source code that produced the problem >>>> should have been shown. It's hard to debug code that you can't see. >>> Why is this group so intolerant? >> >>Because what you call intolerance, we call topicality. When you post a >>message to a group where it is on-topic, the message gets seen and > >Only an arrogant idiot would think that errors on linking object files >generated by a C compiler are not relevant in a C language group. > > Indeed. And as you see, there is no shortage of arrogant idiots in comp.lang.c 'Tis always been thus, and always will be. BTW, I note that this thread is (still!) posted to 2 other groups, besides CLC, but the main topic of discussion in the thread (the usual topicality BS) is, of course, only relevant to CLC. Funny, that. -- The book "1984" used to be a cautionary tale; Now it is a "how-to" manual.