Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vq5hlf$1htc6$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception
 out on its ass
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 18:31:43 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vq5hlf$1htc6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq2i40$ug75$3@dont-email.me> <vq2l9p$tth2$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq2m2p$vkkb$1@dont-email.me> <vq3q8m$18icg$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq4d5e$1b4no$2@dont-email.me> <vq51qa$1er5k$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:31:44 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b63ad011626de8fff9e4d30aad622688";
	logging-data="1635718"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+XKxwqji45DwuIJEU29jMe"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pGvnLUQbAtJiVdMFNDqcn/8xLbM=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250303-10, 3/3/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vq51qa$1er5k$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4006

On 3/3/2025 2:01 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 03.mrt.2025 om 15:08 schreef olcott:
>> On 3/3/2025 2:46 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 02.mrt.2025 om 23:28 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 3/2/2025 4:15 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 02.mrt.2025 om 22:21 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> int DD()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DD()
>>>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
>>>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
>>>>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
>>>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
>>>>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002155] c3         ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DD emulated by HHH according to the behavior that DD
>>>>>> specifies cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
>>>>>> and terminate normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This process computes the mapping from the actual input
>>>>>> (not any other damn thing) finite string to the non
>>>>>> terminating behavior that this finite specifies when
>>>>>> it calls its own emulator in recursive emulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words 'non terminating behavior' means that *HHH* was 
>>>>> unable to reach the 'ret' instruction. 
>>>>
>>>> Not at all. The fact that DD calls its own emulator
>>>> makes DD unable to reach its own "ret" instruction.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Counter factual. The exact same finite string in direct execution or 
>>> simulated by HHH1 shows that DD is perfectly able to reach its 'ret' 
>>
>> Because neither of these cases has DD calling its own emulator.
>> Ignoring how this changes the behavior of DD is stupid.
>>
> 
> Indeed, HHH is a simulator that cannot possibly simulate itself 
> correctly up to the end, 

If this was not stupidly wrong you could show
all of the steps of DD correctly emulated by HHH
that reaches its own "ret" instruction.

You cannot do that because:
(a) You know that you are wrong
(b) You do not understand these things



-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer